Wiederherstellung gelöschter Seiten

Wenn eine Seite weg ist, ist der erste Schritt ehrliche Analyse — nicht noch ein Entwurf.

Senden Sie uns die Löschdiskussion oder den abgelehnten Entwurf. Wir überprüfen, was fehlgeschlagen ist, identifizieren die Quellenlücken und schlagen einen Weg vor. Manchmal ist das Wiederherstellung; manchmal ist es eine andere Plattform; manchmal ist es Warten.

Senden Sie uns die Löschdiskussion Alle Dienstleistungen

What you get

Deleted Page Recovery

We review the deletion discussion, identify the source gaps, and propose a recovery strategy. When a page is unlikely to be restored, we suggest a route that actually works: Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition.

Deletion-discussion review
Source gap analysis
Alternative-route recommendation when recovery is unrealistic
Risk-aware re-publication plan

Starting price

Quoted per case

Typical timeline

2-6 weeks

Best for

· Pages with prior deletion discussion
· Rejected drafts
· Repeat-attempt situations

Häufige Löschungsgründe

Das erste, das wir lesen, ist, warum die Seite letztes Mal fehlgeschlagen ist

Relevanz fehlgeschlagen

Quellen erfüllten nicht die Norm für zuverlässige Quellen — nur Pressemitteilungen, gesponserte Inhalte, Affiliate-Blogs.

COI / bezahlte Bearbeitung gekennzeichnet

Änderungen zurückgeführt auf Unternehmenskonten, IPs oder nicht offengelegte bezahlte Editoren. Vertrauen weg.

Werbetonus

Auch mit echten Quellen klang der Text nach Marketing. Rückgängigmachung, Markierung, schließlich gelöscht.

Gesperrte Überschrift

Nach wiederholten Löschungen ist die Überschrift für die Neuerstellung gesperrt. Benötigt einen strategischen Neuansatz.

Alternative Wege

Wenn Wiederherstellung nicht realistisch ist — was stattdessen funktioniert

Wir verkaufen keinen Entwurf, dem wir nicht zutrauen, dass er die Überprüfung übersteht. Oft liefert eine andere Plattform mehr SEO und KI-Sichtbarkeit — schneller und ohne Löschungsrisiko.

Auf neue Medienbeiträge warten

Manchmal ist die richtige Antwort, nichts zu veröffentlichen und in 12-18 Monaten erneut zu besuchen.

Nur Wikidata

Ein sauberes Wikidata-Objekt erfasst Knowledge Graph und LLM-Abdeckung ohne Löschungsrisiko.

Einfache englische Wikipedia

Leichtere redaktionelle Standards, vollständige Wikipedia-Infrastruktur, nahezu identische SEO-Autorität.

Andere Sprachversionen

Verschiedene Gemeinschaften haben unterschiedliche Relevanz-Schwellwerte. Wir bewerten und schlagen vor.

Frequently asked questions

Wiederherstellung gelöschter Seiten — was Menschen fragen

Wikipedia eligibility

How do you decide whether a company qualifies for Wikipedia?

We run a source-first assessment against Wikipedia's notability policy for organisations. The bar is independent, in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources — not press releases or sponsored content. If the source base is weak, we say so up front and recommend an alternative route (Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition).

Which subjects do you not take on?

Subjects with insufficient independent media coverage, brands that have already been deleted with no new sources, and any work that would require violating Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest or paid-editing policies.

What counts as a reliable source?

Independent media that has a clear editorial policy and is generally regarded as reliable for the subject matter. We follow the Wikipedia community's reliable-sources guidance and the perennial-sources list. Trade press, regional outlets and academic publications often count; press-release wires, sponsored content and affiliate blogs do not.

Do press releases count as sources?

No. Press releases are self-published — they originate from the company itself or from PR distribution wires, regardless of which outlet republishes them. The same applies to founder LinkedIn posts, contributed "thought leadership" pieces, and sponsored articles. None of them establish notability on their own, no matter how many you have.

Our coverage is mostly in trade press — does that work?

Often yes, but it depends on the outlet. Established trade publications with a real editorial team and a track record of independent reporting are accepted for NCORP purposes; pay-to-play industry sites and contributor-network pages are not. Source audit tells us which side of the line each outlet sits on before we commit to drafting.

Process & timelines

How long does a Wikipedia page take?

Typically 3-4 weeks from contract signature: briefing and source audit, drafting, your review and approval, then gradual publication and the 90-day monitoring window.

What happens after the page is published?

Every published page comes with 90 days of monitoring at no extra cost — we respond to edits, tags, and flag attempts during that window. After 90 days the page transfers fully to your responsibility unless you've enrolled in one of our annual support plans (€420 / €750 / €1,200 / €3,500 / year). Without ongoing support we no longer hold responsibility for what happens to the page after the 90-day window closes.

How are edits made on existing pages?

Small, gradual edits by experienced editors over several days, with talk-page hygiene. We avoid bursty changes that look promotional and trigger reverts.

You don't translate — you "localise". What does that mean?

Each language edition of Wikipedia is its own community with its own sourcing expectations. A literal translation of the English article almost always fails review elsewhere. We rewrite for the target edition: integrate sources in the local language, adjust which facts belong in the lede, drop or expand sections to match what that community treats as encyclopedic. Same subject, different article — that's localisation.

Guarantees & risk policy

Do you guarantee that a page will be published?

No — and we don't believe anyone should. Wikipedia is an independent community with its own editorial review. What we do guarantee is a risk-managed process: we don't recommend going to publication unless the source base supports notability, and we run a 93% success rate on the pages we do take on.

What if a page is deleted after publication?

Within the 90-day monitoring window, we defend the page and republish if necessary. If we fail to restore a deleted page after three attempts within that window, we refund 80% of the project fee.

Can you guarantee a Google Knowledge Panel?

No. Knowledge Panels are driven by Google's own systems, fed in part by Wikidata and Wikipedia. Our work materially raises the probability that a panel appears, but Google makes the final call.

Do you disclose that you're paid to edit Wikipedia?

Yes — on every project, every time. The Wikimedia Terms of Use require paid contributors to disclose the contributing firm, the client, and the intended beneficiary. We disclose on the editor's user page, on the article talk page at creation, and in edit summaries during the work. This is non-negotiable. We refuse projects that ask us to hide the relationship — undisclosed paid editing is the single most common reason this kind of work gets banned and pages get deleted.

Where to next

Pages readers open after this one

Why pages get deleted

The 12 failure patterns behind most deletions.

Scammed by a vendor first?

The recovery playbook: money, reports, on-wiki cleanup.

Notability Audit

Whether a rebuilt page can actually survive this time.

Annual Support

So the recovered page never needs recovering again.

Haben Sie eine Löschdiskussions-URL oder einen abgelehnten Entwurf?

Senden Sie sie. Wir lesen sie sorgfältig durch und antworten mit dem, was realistisch ist — nicht mit dem, was leicht zu verkaufen ist.

Request Assessment

Loading…

Wenn eine Seite weg ist, ist der erste Schritt ehrliche Analyse — nicht noch ein Entwurf.