استرجاع الصفحة المحذوفة

عندما تكون الصفحة قد ذهبت، الخطوة الأولى هي تحليل صادق — ليس مسودة أخرى.

أرسل لنا نقاش الحذف أو المسودة المرفوضة. نراجع ما فشل ونحدد فجوات المصادر ونقترح مسارًا. أحيانًا يكون الاسترجاع؛ وأحيانًا منصة مختلفة؛ وأحيانًا الانتظار.

أرسل لنا نقاش الحذف جميع الخدمات

What you get

Deleted Page Recovery

We review the deletion discussion, identify the source gaps, and propose a recovery strategy. When a page is unlikely to be restored, we suggest a route that actually works: Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition.

Deletion-discussion review
Source gap analysis
Alternative-route recommendation when recovery is unrealistic
Risk-aware re-publication plan

Starting price

Quoted per case

Typical timeline

2-6 weeks

Best for

· Pages with prior deletion discussion
· Rejected drafts
· Repeat-attempt situations

أسباب الحذف الشائعة

أول ما نقرأ هو سبب فشل الصفحة آخر مرة

فشلت الملحوظية

لم تفِ المصادر بمعيار المصادر الموثوقة — البيانات الصحفية والمحتوى المدعوم والمدونات التابعة فقط.

صراع المصالح / التحرير المأجور تم الإشارة إليه

تتبع التحديثات إلى حسابات شركات أو عناوين IP أو محررين مأجورين غير مصرح بهم. الثقة ذهبت.

نبرة ترويجية

حتى مع المصادر الحقيقية، قرأ النثر كتسويق. تم الاسترجاع والوسم والحذف في النهاية.

عنوان مملح

بعد الحذف المتكرر، العنوان مقفول من إعادة الخلق. يحتاج إلى نهج استراتيجي إعادة.

طرق بديلة

عندما لا يكون الاسترجاع واقعياً — ما يعمل بدلاً من ذلك

لا نبيع مسودة لا نؤمن بأنها ستنجح من المراجعة. غالباً ما تسلم منصة مختلفة مزيد من البحث ورؤية الذكاء الاصطناعي، أسرع، مع صفر خطر الحذف.

انتظر التغطية الإعلامية الجديدة

في بعض الأحيان يكون الجواب الصحيح عدم نشر أي شيء وإعادة النظر في 12-18 شهر.

ويكيداتا فقط

كيان ويكيداتا نظيف يلتقط لوحة المعرفة وتغطية LLM مع صفر خطر الحذف.

ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية البسيطة

معايير تحريرية أخف، بنية ويكيبيديا الكاملة، سلطة SEO متطابقة تقريباً.

إصدار لغة أخرى

المجتمعات المختلفة لديها عتبات ملحوظية مختلفة. نقيّم ونقترح.

Frequently asked questions

استرجاع الصفحة المحذوفة — ما يسأل الناس

Wikipedia eligibility

How do you decide whether a company qualifies for Wikipedia?

We run a source-first assessment against Wikipedia's notability policy for organisations. The bar is independent, in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources — not press releases or sponsored content. If the source base is weak, we say so up front and recommend an alternative route (Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition).

Which subjects do you not take on?

Subjects with insufficient independent media coverage, brands that have already been deleted with no new sources, and any work that would require violating Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest or paid-editing policies.

What counts as a reliable source?

Independent media that has a clear editorial policy and is generally regarded as reliable for the subject matter. We follow the Wikipedia community's reliable-sources guidance and the perennial-sources list. Trade press, regional outlets and academic publications often count; press-release wires, sponsored content and affiliate blogs do not.

Do press releases count as sources?

No. Press releases are self-published — they originate from the company itself or from PR distribution wires, regardless of which outlet republishes them. The same applies to founder LinkedIn posts, contributed "thought leadership" pieces, and sponsored articles. None of them establish notability on their own, no matter how many you have.

Our coverage is mostly in trade press — does that work?

Often yes, but it depends on the outlet. Established trade publications with a real editorial team and a track record of independent reporting are accepted for NCORP purposes; pay-to-play industry sites and contributor-network pages are not. Source audit tells us which side of the line each outlet sits on before we commit to drafting.

Process & timelines

How long does a Wikipedia page take?

Typically 3-4 weeks from contract signature: briefing and source audit, drafting, your review and approval, then gradual publication and the 90-day monitoring window.

What happens after the page is published?

Every published page comes with 90 days of monitoring at no extra cost — we respond to edits, tags, and flag attempts during that window. After 90 days the page transfers fully to your responsibility unless you've enrolled in one of our annual support plans (€420 / €750 / €1,200 / €3,500 / year). Without ongoing support we no longer hold responsibility for what happens to the page after the 90-day window closes.

How are edits made on existing pages?

Small, gradual edits by experienced editors over several days, with talk-page hygiene. We avoid bursty changes that look promotional and trigger reverts.

You don't translate — you "localise". What does that mean?

Each language edition of Wikipedia is its own community with its own sourcing expectations. A literal translation of the English article almost always fails review elsewhere. We rewrite for the target edition: integrate sources in the local language, adjust which facts belong in the lede, drop or expand sections to match what that community treats as encyclopedic. Same subject, different article — that's localisation.

Guarantees & risk policy

Do you guarantee that a page will be published?

No — and we don't believe anyone should. Wikipedia is an independent community with its own editorial review. What we do guarantee is a risk-managed process: we don't recommend going to publication unless the source base supports notability, and we run a 93% success rate on the pages we do take on.

What if a page is deleted after publication?

Within the 90-day monitoring window, we defend the page and republish if necessary. If we fail to restore a deleted page after three attempts within that window, we refund 80% of the project fee.

Can you guarantee a Google Knowledge Panel?

No. Knowledge Panels are driven by Google's own systems, fed in part by Wikidata and Wikipedia. Our work materially raises the probability that a panel appears, but Google makes the final call.

Do you disclose that you're paid to edit Wikipedia?

Yes — on every project, every time. The Wikimedia Terms of Use require paid contributors to disclose the contributing firm, the client, and the intended beneficiary. We disclose on the editor's user page, on the article talk page at creation, and in edit summaries during the work. This is non-negotiable. We refuse projects that ask us to hide the relationship — undisclosed paid editing is the single most common reason this kind of work gets banned and pages get deleted.

Where to next

Pages readers open after this one

Why pages get deleted

The 12 failure patterns behind most deletions.

Scammed by a vendor first?

The recovery playbook: money, reports, on-wiki cleanup.

Notability Audit

Whether a rebuilt page can actually survive this time.

Annual Support

So the recovered page never needs recovering again.

هل لديك رابط نقاش حذف أو مسودة مرفوضة؟

أرسلها. سنقرأها بعناية ونرد بما هو واقعي — ليس ما هو سهل البيع.

Request Assessment

Loading…

عندما تكون الصفحة قد ذهبت، الخطوة الأولى هي تحليل صادق — ليس مسودة أخرى.