Alt-wiki services · Wikitia
Wikitia is an independently run wiki encyclopedia with professional editorial review — and no mandatory press-coverage requirement. For €460 we research, draft and shepherd your entry through review in 7-14 days, and we are honest about what it is and what it is not.
Who it's for
Wikipedia requires significant coverage in independent, reliable media before a page can survive (WP:N). Plenty of real, verifiable businesses and people are not there yet. Wikitia is the route that documents them now, while the coverage builds.
Funding announcements and launch posts rarely count as the sustained, independent coverage Wikipedia requires. Wikitia's review checks the verifiable record of the company as it stands today.
Real revenue, real customers — in a category trade journalists cover thinly. Professional editorial review verifies your facts; it does not count your press clippings.
A strong footprint at home, with coverage concentrated in local outlets that Wikipedia editors often discount. Wikitia documents the brand without that discount.
Speakers, authors and advisors building a public record that does not yet amount to “significant coverage.” An encyclopedic profile gives that record one structured, citable home.
Unsure which side of the bar you are on? The Wikipedia notability audit (from €490) scores your sourcing against WP:N and tells you which route fits — before you spend anything on the wrong one. And if your coverage already holds, skip this page and start with Wikipedia page creation: it remains the strongest single signal there is.
Plain answers
Most agencies blur this. We would rather you know exactly what you are buying.
Independently run
Wikitia is a standalone wiki encyclopedia with a paid, professional editorial team. It is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation, and it is not a Wikipedia fork or sister project.
Professionally reviewed
Entries pass a structured editorial review for verifiability, neutral tone and formatting. It is a real bar — just not Wikipedia's volunteer-consensus bar, and there is no mandatory media-coverage threshold.
Indexed, with honest weight
Google indexes Wikitia entries and they surface in name and brand searches. The trust weight is lower than Wikipedia's — we say that plainly — so we frame it as corroboration, not substitution.
The frame in one line: a Wikitia page is a professionally reviewed encyclopedic record you can have now — while Wikipedia stays the destination you build toward.
Side by side
Four encyclopedic platforms, four very different bars. This is the comparison we walk every client through before they order anything.
| Criterion | Wikipedia | WikitiaThis service | Grokipedia | EverybodyWiki |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editorial bar | Volunteer editor consensus | Professional editorial review | AI-generated (xAI's Grok) | Open contribution, light review |
| Media-coverage requirement | Mandatory (WP:N) | None | Footprint-based | None |
| Google indexation | Strongest | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| AI-citation likelihood | Highest of any single source | Moderate — supplementary corroboration | Concentrated in the Grok ecosystem | Low |
| Price | from €1,930 | €460 | €700 | €345 |
| Timeline | 3-4 weeks | 7-14 days | 10-14 days | 5-10 days |
The honest read of this table: alt-wikis corroborate, never substitute. If you want placements sequenced with the knowledge-graph backbone, see the AI Visibility packages (€700 / €1,500 / €3,500). The Grokipedia column is reference-only — our standalone Grokipedia service was discontinued in June 2026.
The upgrade path
The mistake we see most is treating an alt-wiki page as the end state. It is the first rung of a deliberate sequence.
Whether your company can realistically climb this ladder is a question with a measurable answer — our guide Can my company get a Wikipedia page? walks through how editors actually decide.
Step 1
A Wikitia entry goes live in 7-14 days: researched, neutrally written, professionally reviewed and indexed by Google. From day one there is a structured encyclopedic record of you to point at.
Step 2
Notability is built, not declared. Our media-coverage program earns the independent press Wikipedia requires, and the Source Readiness work inside the notability audit scores the distance as you go.
Step 3
When the file holds, we draft for Wikipedia. The research, sourcing and structure from your Wikitia work transfer into that draft — we sequence the engagements so the earlier work is reused, never repeated.
Scope and price
One fixed price, one deliverable, no retainer. The scope below is the whole engagement — nothing is sold separately mid-project.
€460
one-time · delivered in 7-14 days
What we will ask for at the start: a short brief and your key verifiable facts. We handle research, drafting, submission and review from there.
Also available in the self-checkout catalogue.
The honest part
We sell this service every week, and it works best for clients who order it with accurate expectations.
It will not
It reliably does
The commitment behind the price: if your brief shows sourcing that already looks close to Wikipedia's bar, we will say so before taking the order — €460 on a page you did not need is a bad trade for both of us. In that case the notability audit is the honest first step.
Frequently asked questions
Where to next
Send your brief. If Wikitia is the right rung, your entry is live in 7-14 days. If your sourcing says Wikipedia is already in reach, we will tell you that instead — within 48 hours.