Loading…
OSINT Investigation
When a Wikipedia page about you, your competitors, or your category needs scrutiny — we apply OSINT techniques to map who's editing, what sources they're pushing, and what patterns matter.
What you get
We use open-source intelligence techniques to investigate editor activity, coordinated edit patterns, and disputed sources on Wikipedia pages tied to your brand or competitors. Output is an evidence-led report — useful for legal teams, communications leads, and decision support before sensitive edits.
Starting price
Engagement-based pricing
Typical timeline
1-3 weeks
Best for
When teams hire us
Repeated negative edits, anonymous editors who only edit pages tied to your brand, suspiciously sourced claims that won't go away.
Before publishing a high-profile page, know who watches related categories and which sources will get challenged on review.
Legal or PR team is preparing a complaint to Wikipedia about defamatory content. An evidence-led report supports the case.
Track edits to competitor pages, edits about your category, and emerging narratives — without inserting yourself into any edit war.
What you receive
Our reports are confidential and intended for internal use. We don't make public statements, file edit-warring complaints, or interact with Wikipedia editors on behalf of clients — that work, if needed, is a separate engagement with a different policy frame.
Frequently asked questions
Tell us what's happening and what you'd like to know. We'll come back with scope, timeline and an NDA proposal.