Loading…
Clients
Since 2010, WikiBusines has served clients and partners in 80 countries — companies, startups, NGOs, founders and public figures. Most of it under NDA. No logo wall here: numbers, patterns and anonymized precedents instead.
Track record
Confidentiality limits what we can show about individual clients. It does not limit the aggregate record — these figures come from our internal delivery records and are restated on every page of this site, from the same source.
15+
years in operation — founded 2010
4,000+
clients served: companies, startups, NGOs and individuals
1,000+
pages published in the last year
93%
publication success rate
160+
Wikipedia language editions worked in
Source: internal delivery records, 2010–2025. Success rate counts pages that passed review and remained live through the 90-day monitoring window.
Most engagements begin with Wikipedia page creation; the rest is editing, defence, annual support and AI-visibility work built around it.
The honest difference
Wikipedia work is conflict-of-interest-sensitive, and most of our engagements run under NDA. A logo wall would be good marketing and bad practice. We treat confidentiality as part of the service — here is how that works in your favour.
What we don't publish
What you can verify instead
Read the anonymity as a signal: the discretion you see on this page is the discretion you get as a client. Your engagement, your sources and your internal materials stay private. The missing logos are not a gap in our proof — they are the proof we keep our NDAs.
Industries
Industry rarely decides the outcome — independent coverage does. But each sector has a typical engagement shape, and knowing yours saves a discovery call.
Funded startups and established vendors. The usual shape: an English page once coverage supports it, Wikidata from day one, and a Knowledge Panel as the visible result.
Payments, banking infrastructure and crypto-adjacent firms. Sourcing standards are stricter here, so engagements usually open with a notability assessment rather than a draft.
Clinical-stage companies and health-tech vendors. Conservative sourcing, careful claims — and defence work when pages draw editor scrutiny.
Carriers, manufacturers and infrastructure groups. Often multi-language: pages in the editions of the markets where the group actually operates.
Policy institutes, foundations and public organizations. The typical path builds independent coverage first, then the page — not the other way around.
Agencies and production companies, frequently under white-label terms: we deliver the Wikipedia work, they own the client relationship.
VC firms, funds and individual investors. Firm and partner pages, kept current as funds close and portfolios change.
Executives, authors, athletes, officials and candidates. Personal pages under the stricter people-notability rules, with monitoring as standard.
The grid covers the most frequent patterns, not the limits — the long tail runs from FMCG and real estate to hotels and e-commerce. Unsure whether your coverage qualifies? Start with Can my company get a Wikipedia page?
Anonymized precedents
Real engagements with identifying details removed or generalized. Each outcome describes what happened in that case — not what we promise in yours; odds always depend on your coverage.
Page published and a Google Knowledge Panel live within six weeks; both stable through the 90-day monitoring window.
Details anonymized under NDA
Existing page nominated for deletion; the discussion closed as keep and the page was retained. The client moved to annual support afterwards.
Details anonymized under NDA
Pages published in four Wikipedia language editions across the group's operating markets, each sourced to local independent coverage.
Details anonymized under NDA
The audit found coverage too thin for a safe attempt. After a source-readiness program, the page was published in month five.
What a notability audit covers
Details anonymized under NDA
First measured AI-citation events appeared within 60 days of the retainer starting; the program continues month to month.
Details anonymized under NDA
A previously deleted page was rewritten, re-sourced and restored. Monitoring since: no further deletion nominations.
Details anonymized under NDA
Why pages get nominated for deletion in the first place — and what defence actually involves — is covered in Why Wikipedia pages get deleted.
Geography
Publication is only half the work — we also make 5,000+ edits a year maintaining and updating existing pages across markets and language editions.
80
countries with clients and partners
Coverage concentrated in
160+
Wikipedia language editions, English-first
Delivery is remote-first from Kyiv, Ukraine, where the company has operated since 2010 — more on the team and the company on the about page.
Reference checks
A logo-free page should not be taken on faith. There is a process for verifying us in a qualified conversation — it takes three steps.
Step 1
Sector, goal, current coverage. A short written brief or one call — whichever you prefer. No deck required.
Step 2
We pull the closest anonymized engagements — same sector, same task shape — and walk you through what happened, including the ones that took longer than planned.
Step 3
Where a past client in your category has consented to referencing, we arrange a direct call. We will not produce a named list on demand — that is the same NDA you will benefit from.
Start it on the contact page — sector, goal and current coverage are enough for a useful first reply.
Frequently asked questions
A short brief is enough: sector, goal, current coverage. You get the nearest precedent we have and an honest read on whether your case is workable.