Loading…
Capability map
The specialized modules agencies, communications teams and enterprises ask us for: crisis response, COI resolution, source forensics, monitoring, intelligence and the AI-visibility layer. Grouped into eight families, described without hype.
How to read this page
Day-to-day engagements run through the productized services on our services hub, anchored by Wikipedia page creation. This page is the layer behind them: the full capability map WikiBusines quotes custom and enterprise work from. Every module below links to its dedicated page where one exists — everything else is scoped per engagement after a short call.
Module family 01
The foundation modules most engagements start from. Each has a dedicated page with scope, pricing and process — the catalog entries below are the short version.
Source-first page creation across 160+ language editions. Every project starts with a notability and source assessment — if the source base will not hold, we say so before you spend.
Structured updates to existing pages: new facts, fresh sourcing, infobox and structure repair. Edits are applied gradually by experienced editors to keep the page stable.
Deletion-discussion forensics, source-gap analysis and a realistic restore-or-reroute verdict. When recovery is unlikely, we recommend an alternative route instead of selling a retry.
Four support tiers that keep a published page accurate, defended and policy-compliant year-round — from quarterly maintenance to near real-time response.
A paid, source-by-source verdict on whether a page is defensible before you commission one. Includes a deletion-risk rating and a roadmap if the answer is not yet.
Most recovery and audit work traces back to the same root causes — our analysis of why Wikipedia pages get deleted explains what the audit screens for.
Module family 02
Work on pages under pressure: disputes, hostile edits, crisis cycles. All of it runs through Wikipedia policy and dispute-resolution procedure — none of it through tricks.
Representation in talk-page discussions with editors and administrators: consensus-building, policy-grounded argumentation and documented outcomes.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
We bring pages and edit histories into line with Wikipedia's paid-editing and COI disclosure rules — resolving tags and editor disputes through proper disclosure, not concealment.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
De-escalation of revert cycles through dispute-resolution channels: page-protection requests, noticeboard filings and consensus procedure — not counter-reverting.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Fast cleanup of vandalism and defamatory edits, plus protection requests where the edit pattern justifies them.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Where a page overweights criticism or leans on weak sources, we add reliable sources and restore due weight under Wikipedia policy. We do not whitewash — true, well-sourced criticism stays.
A 24–72 hour mobilization when a PR event reaches your page: intensive monitoring, sourcing corrections and talk-page engagement while the news cycle is still moving.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Module family 03
The unglamorous layer that decides outcomes: source quality, draft procedure, licensing and citation hygiene. Most deletion outcomes are decided here, not in the prose.
Pre-publication review of every candidate source for independence, reliability and affiliation — the same tests editors apply in deletion discussions.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
We carry drafts through the Articles for Creation process: reviewer feedback, resubmission strategy and the policy fixes that turn a declined draft into an accepted page.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Correct licensing and upload of logos and imagery to Wikimedia Commons — the layer that feeds Google's Knowledge Panel and AI image understanding.
Dead-link recovery, citation formatting and reference-quality upgrades that clear maintenance tags and lower a page's deletion risk.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Native-grade adaptation of a page into additional language editions across 160+ Wikipedias, mapped to each community's local notability and sourcing rules.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Module family 04
A published page is open to anonymous edits at any moment. These modules decide how fast you find out — and who responds.
Real-time edit alerts by email and Telegram within minutes of a change, with side-by-side diffs, editor identity and exportable analytics. Self-serve, per-page subscription.
Every page we publish is watched for 90 days at no extra charge — reverts, maintenance tags and talk-page activity are handled inside the engagement.
Portfolio monitoring for agencies and groups: many pages, one dashboard, consolidated alerts and client-ready reporting. API delivery available for enterprise stacks.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Module family 05
Decision support before you act: how your category looks on Wikipedia, how competitors are represented, and who is actually editing the pages that matter to you.
A structured report on how competitors are represented: page completeness, tone, sourcing quality and editing activity — and where you stand against them.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
A map of the category and article landscape around your industry: which articles exist, which are missing, and where your expertise could legitimately be cited.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Evidence-led investigation of editor clusters, coordinated editing and disputed sources around a page. Built for legal and communications teams; confidential reporting only.
Module family 06
Wikipedia and Wikidata are among the most heavily cited sources in AI answers. These modules extend encyclopedic work into the layer ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity actually read.
Structured entity records with stable identifiers and multilingual labels — the machine-readable layer behind Google's Knowledge Panel and most confident AI answers.
Answer-engine optimization of Wikipedia content itself: structure, facts and sourcing shaped so AI assistants quote the page accurately.
Three productized packages that document your entity across the sources AI systems already trust — measured by real citation events, not promises.
Community-safe authority building on the two platforms AI answer engines quote most often outside the encyclopedia. Expert contributions, no spam.
A canonical, AI-readable knowledge hub about your organization — structured for retrieval by assistants and answer engines.
The mechanics behind this family — which sources AI answer engines actually cite, and why — are covered in Wikipedia, Wikidata & AI search.
Module family 07
Supplementary platforms for subjects that do not yet clear Wikipedia's notability bar — or that want corroborating coverage around a core page. We are candid about their lower trust weight.
An editor-reviewed wiki with indexation value — a documented presence for subjects still building toward Wikipedia-grade coverage.
Our standalone Grokipedia placement service was discontinued in June 2026. The reference page documents how the entry layer works; the same source-engineering levers run inside the AI Visibility Packages.
Supplementary wiki placements used to corroborate the core record. These carry less trust weight than Wikipedia itself — we position them as reinforcement, never substitution.
The same wikipedia.org domain with a far smaller community and lighter enforcement — a realistic route when the main English edition pushes back.
Module family 08
Standing arrangements for agencies, enterprises and in-house teams that touch Wikipedia more than once a year.
Back-office Wikipedia delivery for PR, SEO and legal agencies: white-label under NDA, or a 20% referral model where we take the client relationship.
Prioritized delivery, compliance documentation and a named senior editor for enterprises and regulated industries.
A tailored internal handbook that tells your communications team exactly what it may and may not do on Wikipedia — disclosure rules included.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
A monthly block of senior-editor hours for strategy, reviews and second opinions — without commissioning a full project each time.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Workshops for communications and legal teams on how Wikipedia actually works: policy, sourcing, talk-page conduct and escalation paths.
Scoped per engagement — request a scope
Pricing logic
Productized modules carry canonical anchors. Everything else in this catalog is priced per engagement after scoping — effort on Wikipedia depends on edit history, source quality and dispute load, which we assess before quoting.
| Module | Typical anchor | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Wikipedia page creation | from €1,930 (English company page) | Page creation → |
| Editing and updating | from €700 | Editing service → |
| Deleted page recovery | Quoted per case — deletion history drives effort | Page recovery → |
| Real-time monitoring (SaaS) | from €79/yr per page | WikiMonitoring → |
| Managed annual support | from €420/yr | Support plans → |
| Wikidata entity | from €550 per entity | Wikidata service → |
| Everything else in this catalog | Scoped per engagement — request a quote | Request a quote → |
The canonical price list for every productized service lives on the pricing page. Custom scopes are quoted in writing before any work starts.
Where we draw the line
A capability map this broad invites the wrong requests. To save both sides a call, here is what WikiBusines does not sell — at any price.
The full commitments are documented in our guarantees and the ethics section of about WikiBusines.
Frequently asked questions
Describe the page, the risk or the gap. We reply within 48 hours with the module mix we would actually use — and a written quote before anything starts.