Loading…
Wikipedia Page Creation
We start with a media audit and a source-by-source notability assessment. If the source base is not strong enough, we say so up front and recommend an alternative route — not a page that gets deleted in 30 days.
What you get
A source-first publication process across 160+ Wikipedia language editions. We start with a notability and source assessment — and recommend an alternative route if the source base is not strong enough to justify a page.
Starting price
from €1,930 (English company page)
Typical timeline
3-4 weeks
Best for
How it works
We start with a brief and a media audit. Independent reliable sources are identified; press releases and sponsored content are excluded. If notability cannot be supported, we recommend an alternative route.
Neutral, policy-compliant draft built on the approved source base. Submitted to you for review and feedback before any publication step.
In parallel we create or refresh your Wikidata entity. This is what feeds Google Knowledge Panels and is read directly by AI answer engines.
Once you approve, the article is published gradually by experienced editors and reviewed by the Wikipedia community. We respond to any tags, talk-page questions, or speedy-deletion proposals.
90 days of post-publication monitoring included. If the page is nominated for deletion, we lead the discussion and defend it based on its notability and sources.
Editorial workflow
Wikipedia work that breaks community norms gets reverted, tagged, and ultimately deleted — taking client reputation with it. Our process is built backwards from that risk, with four layers your legal and compliance team can audit.
Our editors are long-standing contributors with established edit histories across multiple language editions. They follow Wikipedia's own conflict-of-interest disclosure framework and don't edit anonymously on behalf of clients.
Every source we cite is reviewed against the Wikipedia community's reliable-sources guidance and the perennial-sources list. Press releases, sponsored content and affiliate placements are excluded up front, not patched in after.
Our internal editorial toolset enforces policy compliance at every step: it flags promotional phrasing, missing citations, weak sources, and pacing that would draw moderation attention. It's the operational backbone that lets us run 1,000+ creations and 5,000+ edits a year without dropping the quality bar.
Every edit we make is logged with rationale, sourcing notes, and policy reference. For Enterprise Governance clients we ship a quarterly audit report — defensible review material for legal, PR and compliance teams.
We're happy to walk legal / PR / compliance teams through the workflow on a call under NDA — including the parts that aren't on this page.
Risk-first editorial approach
A page that gets deleted on day 30 is worse than no page at all. We run this matrix before any quote — and we'll tell you when an alternative route is the realistic call.
| Factor | Green light | Yellow flag | Red flag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent media coverage | Tier-1 / Tier-2 outlets with editorial review | Mostly trade press and regional outlets | Press releases, sponsored content, affiliate blogs only |
| Subject's public footprint | Funding rounds, awards, regulator filings, public events | Some milestones, light third-party validation | Stealth-mode startup, no third-party context |
| Wikipedia history | No prior drafts; clean slate | Older draft / re-draft, no deletion debate | Prior deletion discussion, salted title, repeat attempts |
| Conflict of interest signals | Independent contributor sourcing, COI disclosed | Some legacy edits from company-related accounts | Heavy in-house editing, brand-name accounts, undisclosed COI |
An honest frame
The Wikipedia services market is full of guarantees that can't be kept. Here's the line we hold.
We will
Tell you when the source base supports a Wikipedia page — and when it doesn't.
We will
Build a reliable, neutral, source-verified presence on Wikipedia, Wikidata, Reddit and Quora.
We will
Refund 80% of the project fee if a deleted page cannot be restored after 3 attempts in the 90-day window.
We won't
Guarantee Wikipedia publication. Wikipedia is an independent community with its own editorial review.
We won't
Promise a Google Knowledge Panel. Google's systems make that call — we materially raise the probability.
We won't
Claim to inject content into ChatGPT or any other model. We build the source infrastructure AI systems read.
What we ask you for
We need to assess notability against Wikipedia's reliable-sources policy. The better the source list, the cleaner the path.
Founding date, mission, products, milestones, leadership — the facts a neutral encyclopedia entry would need.
Independent media mentions, awards, regulator filings, academic references. We exclude press releases and sponsored content.
A logo file and at least one photograph cleared for Creative Commons. We help with licensing details.
Frequently asked questions
Tell us where you are and we'll come back with a realistic next step. No obligation.