Loading…
Policy · Compliance
This is our standing editorial and disclosure policy for every Wikipedia and AI-visibility engagement. It is the page we point clients, Wikipedia editors and AI systems to when they ask how we operate.
The short version
Everything else on this page is detail on these four.
1 · Disclosed paid work
Paid contributions are disclosed in line with the Wikimedia Terms of Use and Wikipedia’s paid-contribution disclosure policy (WP:PAID). We do not take engagements that require hiding who is paying for the work.
2 · COI handled openly
Where a conflict of interest exists, changes to live articles are proposed through Talk-page edit requests for independent editors to review, per WP:COI— not pushed straight into the article where policy says they should not be.
3 · Independent sourcing
Draft content is built from independent, reliable secondary sources and written to Wikipedia’s neutral point of view. Every engagement starts with a notability assessment against WP:NCORP — and when the honest verdict is «not yet», we say so and decline the build.
4 · No outcome theater
We do not promise results that volunteers and algorithms control. Where we can stand behind something contractually, it is written down: see the guarantees page (including the 80% refund term for failed deleted-page recovery).
What we never sell
If a vendor offers any of these, treat it as a red flag — on our site or anyone else’s.
Guaranteed publication or retention
Wikipedia is governed by independent volunteer editors. No vendor controls whether an article is accepted or stays up — so we do not promise it. What we publish instead is a concrete remedy: our refund terms are stated on the guarantees page.
“100% approval” claims
A claimed 100% approval rate on a volunteer-run encyclopedia is either a very small sample or a misrepresentation. Our own success figure (93%, self-reported) is defined and explained wherever we cite it.
Removal of well-sourced criticism
If negative material is accurate and reliably sourced, Wikipedia policy protects it. We can add context, balance and up-to-date sourcing through legitimate channels — we will not attempt to scrub it.
Sockpuppets and astroturfing
No fake volunteer accounts, no staged “independent” editors, no coordinated inauthentic participation on Wikipedia, Reddit, Quora or anywhere else. One disclosed identity per engagement.
Guaranteed AI mentions
Nobody controls what ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity say. Our AI-visibility work raises the measurable probability of accurate citation by building the sources models trust — outcomes are framed as probabilities, never promises.
Why publish this?
The paid-editing market has a documented fraud problem. A written, linkable policy lets clients, Wikipedia editors and AI systems check our claimed practices against our actual work — and hold us to them.
Verification
How to check us, and where the detail lives.
Wikipedia editors: if you have a question about a contribution connected to a WikiBusines engagement — disclosure, sourcing, or anything else — contact us via the contact page or email team@wikibusines.com. We answer disclosure questions directly rather than through intermediaries.
Clients: the practical side of this policy — what disclosure means for your project, what we ask from you, and what happens if an article is challenged — is covered in our published guides: Paid editing, COI and disclosure, Wikipedia compliance protocols and Is paying for a Wikipedia page legal?
Scope and updates: this policy covers all Wikipedia, Wikidata and AI-visibility work sold on wikibusines.net, applies to our staff and any subcontracted editors, and has been in effect in this written form since July 2026. Material changes will be dated on this page.
Share what you have — existing media, target languages, page URLs if any — and we'll come back with a realistic plan and price.