Loading…
Wikipedia Notability Audit
Most deleted pages were doomed before the first edit: the sources never met Wikipedia's bar. We audit your sources against the exact tests editors apply at deletion, then tell you straight — yes, not yet, or here's the faster route.
What you get
A paid, independent assessment of your sources against Wikipedia's notability rules (WP:GNG / WP:NCORP / significant coverage). You get a source-by-source verdict, a go/no-go call, a deletion-risk rating and a roadmap — so you never pay to build a page that gets deleted.
Starting price
€490 / €750 / €1,900 — credited toward your project
Typical timeline
3-7 days
Best for
What we actually check
Notability isn't about how good your company is — it's about whether qualifying coverage already exists. We stress-test every candidate source the way the Wikipedia community does at a deletion discussion.
The source addresses you directly and in depth — enough to write from on its own. Passing mentions and name-drops don't count (WP:SIGCOV).
Not written by you, your team, vendors or sponsors. Bylines, disclosures and contributor status all matter.
Original reporting or analysis — not a rewritten press release, churnalism, or insider interview quotes (WP:ORGIND).
Real editorial oversight and fact-checking, cross-checked against Wikipedia's perennial-sources list — some outlets are deprecated or blacklisted.
Not filings, patents, award listings, your own site or socials. Those are primary and don't establish notability.
At least regional or national reach. Hyper-local-only coverage usually isn't enough for a company (WP:NCORP).
Disqualified automatically: press releases and routine announcements (funding, hires, product launches, awards), sponsored or contributor posts, interviews, directory listings and "best-of" lists. One wire story reprinted everywhere counts as one source — and coverage has to be sustained, not a single news spike.
Three audits
Every tier ends with the same honest verdict. Higher tiers review more sources and hand you more to act on — competitor and AI benchmarking, a draft outline, a media plan, and a strategy call.
€490
3-5 days
The verdict, in plain terms.
€750
5-7 days
Verdict plus a plan you can act on.
€1,900
1-2 weeks
Board-grade — for high-stakes or multi-market subjects.
The audit is paid and fully independent — but if you proceed to a page-creation project with us, your audit fee is credited toward that project. It's risk reduction, not a sunk cost.
What you walk away with
Not there yet?
A No isn't a dead end — it's a sequence. The audit tells you which rung you're on and what it takes to climb.
Step 1
Structured data with a much lower bar — and it already feeds Google's Knowledge Panel and AI answers. Usually the first win.
Step 2
Sometimes a more realistic edition — but notability rules still apply, and we'll say so honestly if it won't hold either.
Step 3
Earn the independent media you're missing before attempting the page. The audit defines exactly what's needed, and in what order.
Step 4
Only once the sources clearly clear the bar. There's no point paying to build a page that gets deleted in a week.
Why pay for a maybe-no
Anyone promising a "guaranteed Wikipedia page" is selling you a deletion. Wikipedia is an independent community with its own review — no agency controls it. A €490 audit that says no can save you a four-figure build that disappears in a week, plus the reputational cost of a public deletion discussion. When the answer is yes, you walk into the project knowing it will hold.
Frequently asked questions
Find out before you spend on a build. A few days, a clear verdict, and a roadmap either way — credited toward your project if you proceed.