שחזור דף שנמחק

כשדף נעלם, הצעד הראשון הוא ניתוח כנה — לא טיוטה נוספת.

שלחו לנו את דיון המחיקה או הטיוטה שנדחתה. אנחנו בוחנים מה נכשל, מאתרים את פערי המקורות ומציעים מסלול. לעיתים זה שחזור; לעיתים זו פלטפורמה אחרת; לעיתים זה המתנה.

שלחו לנו את דיון המחיקה כל השירותים

What you get

Deleted Page Recovery

We review the deletion discussion, identify the source gaps, and propose a recovery strategy. When a page is unlikely to be restored, we suggest a route that actually works: Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition.

Deletion-discussion review
Source gap analysis
Alternative-route recommendation when recovery is unrealistic
Risk-aware re-publication plan

Starting price

Quoted per case

Typical timeline

2-6 weeks

Best for

· Pages with prior deletion discussion
· Rejected drafts
· Repeat-attempt situations

סיבות מחיקה נפוצות

הדבר הראשון שאנחנו קוראים הוא מדוע הדף נכשל בפעם הקודמת

כישלון בולטות

המקורות לא עמדו בסף המקורות האמינים — רק הודעות לעיתונות, תוכן ממומן, בלוגים שותפיים.

סימון COI / עריכה בתשלום

עריכות אותרו לחשבונות ארגוניים, כתובות IP, או עורכים בתשלום לא מוצהרים. האמון נשבר.

טון פרומוציונלי

אפילו עם מקורות אמיתיים, הפרוזה נקראה כשיווק. הוחזרה, תויגה, ולבסוף נמחקה.

כותרת מוגנת

לאחר מחיקות חוזרות, הכותרת נעולה מפני יצירה מחדש. נדרש גישה אסטרטגית מחודשת.

מסלולים חלופיים

כאשר שחזור אינו ריאליסטי — מה עובד במקום

אנחנו לא מוכרים טיוטה שאנחנו לא מאמינים שתעמוד בביקורת. לעיתים קרובות פלטפורמה שונה מספקת נראות חיפוש ובינה מלאכותית רבה יותר, מהר יותר, ללא כל סיכון מחיקה.

המתן לכיסוי תקשורתי חדש

לעיתים התשובה הנכונה היא לא לפרסם דבר ולחזור עניין בעוד 12-18 חודשים.

ויקינתונים בלבד

ישות ויקינתונים נקייה מסכות כיסוי Knowledge Graph ו-LLM ללא כל סיכון מחיקה.

ויקיפדיה אנגלית פשוטה

סטנדרטים עריכתיים קלים יותר, תשתית ויקיפדיה מלאה, סמכות SEO כמעט זהה.

מהדורת שפה אחרת

קהילות שונות בעלות סף בולטות שונה. אנחנו מעריכים ומציעים.

Frequently asked questions

שחזור דף שנמחק — שאלות נפוצות

Wikipedia eligibility

How do you decide whether a company qualifies for Wikipedia?

We run a source-first assessment against Wikipedia's notability policy for organisations. The bar is independent, in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources — not press releases or sponsored content. If the source base is weak, we say so up front and recommend an alternative route (Wikidata, Simple English Wikipedia, or another language edition).

Which subjects do you not take on?

Subjects with insufficient independent media coverage, brands that have already been deleted with no new sources, and any work that would require violating Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest or paid-editing policies.

What counts as a reliable source?

Independent media that has a clear editorial policy and is generally regarded as reliable for the subject matter. We follow the Wikipedia community's reliable-sources guidance and the perennial-sources list. Trade press, regional outlets and academic publications often count; press-release wires, sponsored content and affiliate blogs do not.

Do press releases count as sources?

No. Press releases are self-published — they originate from the company itself or from PR distribution wires, regardless of which outlet republishes them. The same applies to founder LinkedIn posts, contributed "thought leadership" pieces, and sponsored articles. None of them establish notability on their own, no matter how many you have.

Our coverage is mostly in trade press — does that work?

Often yes, but it depends on the outlet. Established trade publications with a real editorial team and a track record of independent reporting are accepted for NCORP purposes; pay-to-play industry sites and contributor-network pages are not. Source audit tells us which side of the line each outlet sits on before we commit to drafting.

Process & timelines

How long does a Wikipedia page take?

Typically 3-4 weeks from contract signature: briefing and source audit, drafting, your review and approval, then gradual publication and the 90-day monitoring window.

What happens after the page is published?

Every published page comes with 90 days of monitoring at no extra cost — we respond to edits, tags, and flag attempts during that window. After 90 days the page transfers fully to your responsibility unless you've enrolled in one of our annual support plans (€420 / €750 / €1,200 / €3,500 / year). Without ongoing support we no longer hold responsibility for what happens to the page after the 90-day window closes.

How are edits made on existing pages?

Small, gradual edits by experienced editors over several days, with talk-page hygiene. We avoid bursty changes that look promotional and trigger reverts.

You don't translate — you "localise". What does that mean?

Each language edition of Wikipedia is its own community with its own sourcing expectations. A literal translation of the English article almost always fails review elsewhere. We rewrite for the target edition: integrate sources in the local language, adjust which facts belong in the lede, drop or expand sections to match what that community treats as encyclopedic. Same subject, different article — that's localisation.

Guarantees & risk policy

Do you guarantee that a page will be published?

No — and we don't believe anyone should. Wikipedia is an independent community with its own editorial review. What we do guarantee is a risk-managed process: we don't recommend going to publication unless the source base supports notability, and we run a 93% success rate on the pages we do take on.

What if a page is deleted after publication?

Within the 90-day monitoring window, we defend the page and republish if necessary. If we fail to restore a deleted page after three attempts within that window, we refund 80% of the project fee.

Can you guarantee a Google Knowledge Panel?

No. Knowledge Panels are driven by Google's own systems, fed in part by Wikidata and Wikipedia. Our work materially raises the probability that a panel appears, but Google makes the final call.

Do you disclose that you're paid to edit Wikipedia?

Yes — on every project, every time. The Wikimedia Terms of Use require paid contributors to disclose the contributing firm, the client, and the intended beneficiary. We disclose on the editor's user page, on the article talk page at creation, and in edit summaries during the work. This is non-negotiable. We refuse projects that ask us to hide the relationship — undisclosed paid editing is the single most common reason this kind of work gets banned and pages get deleted.

Where to next

Pages readers open after this one

Why pages get deleted

The 12 failure patterns behind most deletions.

Scammed by a vendor first?

The recovery playbook: money, reports, on-wiki cleanup.

Notability Audit

Whether a rebuilt page can actually survive this time.

Annual Support

So the recovered page never needs recovering again.

יש לכם כתובת URL לדיון מחיקה או טיוטה שנדחתה?

שלחו אותה. אנחנו נקרא אותה בקפידה ונחזור עם מה שריאליסטי — לא עם מה שקל למכור.

Request Assessment

Loading…

כשדף נעלם, הצעד הראשון הוא ניתוח כנה — לא טיוטה נוספת.