How we create a Wikipedia page:ten stages,from sources to guarantee
We run the whole Wikipedia page creation cycle: source assessment, contract, draft, approval, submission, discussion with editors and 90 days of monitoring with a guarantee. For each stage you can see what we do and what you receive.
// notability audit €490 · 5 days · credited to your package
02 Your project
Stages of Wikipedia page creation: from brief to aftercare
Pick a stage to see what the team does, what we need from you, what you receive and what can slow the work down.
01 · Assessment and contract
02 · Text
03 · Wikipedia community
04 · After publication
Source audit · Company Nexample
Offerexample
Contractexample
Draft · version 1example
Approval · round 2example
Submission · Draft:Company_Nexample
Talk pageexample
Decisionexample
Monitoring windowexample
Edits, tags, nominations
Up to three restoration attempts
80% refund
Guarantee · 12 monthsexample
Typical project time: 4–5 weeks from contract signature. Wikipedia reviewers can extend it.
Stage 1 of 10
Brief and source audit
We assess every source against notability criteria and check the deletion history and language edition.
Your website, the article subject, independent coverage, preferred language, history of earlier attempts.
An assessment of chances and risks, and a recommended route.
If independent sources fall short, the work stops here and you receive the list of reasons.
Stage 2 of 10
Offer
We fix the scope, language editions, timing, price and guarantee terms.
A decision on the route and language editions.
A written offer. An English company page from €2,400.
A scope the sources do not support.
Stage 3 of 10
Contract or invoice
We set up the order: an invoice under the public offer or a separate contract, depending on the type of work. NDA on request.
Billing details and payment. As standard, payment comes before work begins unless we agree otherwise.
A contract or invoice with the terms fixed.
Incomplete paperwork or payment.
Stage 4 of 10
Research and draft
We check dates, figures and claims against sources and write a neutral encyclopedic text.
Documents and answers to questions about the facts.
A draft where every claim has a source.
Claims no reliable source supports.
Stage 5 of 10
Review rounds
We run several rounds of your comments up to final sign-off and check each edit against sources.
Comments on the facts and written approval of the text.
Approved text with a list of the edits made.
Edits without reliable sources and promotional wording stay out of the text.
Stage 6 of 10
Submission to Wikipedia
We disclose paid editing and submit the article through the procedure of that language edition. In English that is Articles for Creation.
Nothing is needed from you, we handle the submission.
A link to the submitted article.
The review queue: the community sets its pace.
Stage 7 of 10
Discussion and review
We answer editors on the talk page under a disclosed account, citing sources and rules.
Additional materials if needed.
Editors' remarks closed.
Objections from editors, questions of notability or conflict of interest.
Stage 8 of 10
Review outcome
We take the article to a decision and act on one of three scenarios: published, revisions, declined.
A quick response if new sources are needed.
The address of the published page or a reasoned decision on the next step.
Reviewers' requests can extend the timing.
Stage 9 of 10
90 days of monitoring, support and guarantee
We respond to edits, tags and deletion nominations. If the page is deleted, we make up to three restoration attempts.
Nothing is needed from you, we respond.
A defended page. If it can't be defended after 3 attempts, we refund 80%.
Only Wikipedia administrators can lock an article.
Stage 10 of 10
Annual support, optional
We keep the page updated under your package. Any package gives a 12-month guarantee.
A choice of package: €720, €1,500 or €3,700 per year.
A 12-month guarantee and content updates under the chosen package.
Without a package, the page is on the client's balance after day 90.
03 Approval loop
Approval of the Wikipedia article text: you check the facts, we check the sources
Nothing is published without your approval. An edit enters the text once a reliable source confirms it, so the article does not have to be rewritten after editors' first remarks.
Text · version 2
Company N
Company N is a European logistics software developer founded in 2012 2011.[1] Its products are used by carriers in twelve countries.[2] In 2025 the company released a route planning module.[3]
Final approval
The company was founded in 2011, not 2012.
Add that we are the market leader.
Mention the route planning module, released in 2025.
illustrative example on the page “Company N”
04 Wikipedia review
Wikipedia editor review: what happens after submission
Independent editors read the article. Wikipedia has no single central moderator, and each language edition has its own procedures. We prepare for three possible outcomes.
The article is published
The page goes live in the main namespace and the 90-day monitoring window starts.
- We switch monitoring on
- We send you the page address
- We respond to the first edits, tags and editors' questions
The guarantee applies: up to three restoration attempts or an 80% refund.
Editors ask for revisions
This is a normal part of review: a request for sources, neutrality or structure.
- We revise the text based on sources
- We answer on the talk page
- We submit the updated version
Timing can extend, because the reviewer sets the pace.
The article is declined
We read the grounds for the decision and work out whether they can be fixed.
- The reason can be fixed: we fix it and resubmit
- Sources fall short: we identify which ones
- Another route: Wikidata, Simple English or another language edition
Resubmission rests on a fixed reason. We don't work around community decisions.
05 After publication
Monitoring after Wikipedia page publication: the first 90 days and what comes next
Publication
The page goes live and monitoring switches on.
Monitoring
Monitoring, support and guarantee: we respond to edits, tags and nomination attempts.
Up to three attempts
If the page is deleted, we make up to three restoration attempts.
Handover
The standard period ends and the page is on your balance.
Event feed · illustrative example
Wikimonitoring
The service tells you about changes to your page and you make the decisions.
from €79 / yearRoute 2 · with the editorial teamAnnual support
Any package gives a 12-month guarantee. Ongoing editorial monitoring comes with the Managed Protection package.
from €720 / year06 Wikimonitoring
How Wikimonitoring works: from page address to alert
Four steps, and you learn about an edit within minutes, in any language. Below is the path of an event through the service.
−412 bytes · IP address · just now
Version diff and a link to the edit
Event path · simplified
07 Incident and two models
Wikimonitoring and Managed Protection: the service alerts, the editors act
Pick an event, look at the version diff and try responding. Then see who takes the next step in each model.
−412 bytes · IP address · just now
±0 bytes · new account · 4 min ago
+64 bytes · editor · 12 min ago
- Detected
- Checked
- Response
- Closed
Wikimonitoring
- Detects changes
- Sends alerts
- Stores version diffs and history
- The client decides
Managed Protection
- Near real-time monitoring
- Response to unwanted edits and tags
- Support in talk page discussions
- 12-month guarantee
Demo with illustrative events. Telegram alerts start with the Personal plan, €99 / year. The Annual Support package, €720 / year, gives content updates and a 12-month guarantee, without ongoing monitoring.
08 Knowledge ecosystem
How facts from Wikipedia and Wikidata reach search and AI: separate platforms, separate rules
These are separate platforms with their own rules, indexing and source selection. There is no direct chain from Wikipedia to Wikidata to Google to ChatGPT, so we work with each node separately. Trace the path of a fact or click a node.
Wikipedia
Encyclopedic text with sources
Context, facts, a cited source
- ← Independent mediaAn article becomes a source for the Wikipedia page
- → WikidataThe article's facts and the record are linked
- → Google SearchThe article is indexed as a page
- → Knowledge GraphOne of the sources for a knowledge panel
- → AI answersContext and facts
Wikidata
Structured entities, identifiers, relations
Entity recognition and data reuse
- ← WikipediaThe article's facts and the record are linked
- → Knowledge GraphStructured facts and identifiers
- → AI answersData about the entity
Independent media
Reporting and journalistic research
Independent facts, news, notability
- → WikipediaAn article becomes a source for the Wikipedia page
- → Google SearchArticles are indexed
- → AI answersIndependent confirmation of facts
Reddit and Quora
Public discussions and answers
Extra context and user opinions
- → Google SearchDiscussions in search results
- → AI answersUser opinions
Official website
Official information and structured markup
Brand identification and primary facts
- → Google SearchSite pages in the index
- → Knowledge GraphPrimary facts and markup
- → AI answersOfficial data
Other platforms
Profiles and reference information
Extra presence, depending on quality and access
- → Google SearchProfiles in search results
Google Search
An index of pages
Shows pages for a query, with order set by Google's own signals
- ← WikipediaThe article is indexed as a page
- ← Independent mediaArticles are indexed
- ← Reddit and QuoraDiscussions in search results
- ← Official websiteSite pages in the index
- ← Other platformsProfiles in search results
- → AI answersAI in search relies on the web index
Knowledge Graph
Entities and their relations
Google builds knowledge panels automatically from many sources, not only Wikidata
- ← WikipediaOne of the sources for a knowledge panel
- ← WikidataStructured facts and identifiers
- ← Official websitePrimary facts and markup
AI answers
Answers with and without sources
Each system has its own source selection logic
- ← WikipediaContext and facts
- ← WikidataData about the entity
- ← Independent mediaIndependent confirmation of facts
- ← Reddit and QuoraUser opinions
- ← Official websiteOfficial data
- ← Google SearchAI in search relies on the web index
Lines show possible use of sources, not automatic data transfer and not a guaranteed brand appearance.
09 Platforms
Wikipedia, Wikidata, Google and AI assistants: what each platform does
Wikipedia
Text with source references, checked by the community.What we doPage creation, edits, recovery, protection.from €2,400Wikidata
Machine-readable statements and identifiers.What we doRecord, sourced statements, links to profiles.from €680Independent media
A source base for Wikipedia and AI systems.What we doCoverage in independent outlets.by programReddit and Quora
Discussions that AI answers often cite.What we doReddit campaigns, expert answers on Quora.from €1,500Official website
Primary facts and brand markup.What we doAI visibility audit.from €490Other platforms
Profiles and reference records beyond Wikipedia.What we doSEO & LLMs Booster Pack on 5 platforms.€2,00010 Search and AI
How Google and AI assistants choose sources: search, Knowledge Graph, AI Overviews
- Discoverythe system finds a page
- Indexingstores its content
- Entitymerges mentions into one object
- Source selectionchooses what to read for a query
- Answerbuilds the result
Pages in search
Google discovers and indexes pages and sets the order of results with its own signals. A Wikipedia page, a website and independent media can all appear in search for a brand name.
Knowledge panel
Google builds panels automatically from many sources, including Wikidata and Wikipedia. Property P2671 in Wikidata links a record to the Knowledge Graph.
AI in Google Search
AI Overviews and AI Mode have their own logic for selecting information and rely on Google's web index. Even a well-optimized page has no guaranteed place in an answer.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity
Assistants combine model knowledge with web search when it is on. Each system draws on a different set of sources, so consistent facts across platforms count for more than one page.
11 Results
Wikipedia page creation results: what we measure and what platforms decide
Measurable indicators
Charts are illustrative and show only the type of measurement.
Platform decisions
We stand behind our process with a contract and our own money. Guarantees →
12 Questions
Wikipedia page creation: FAQ about the process
Who decides what goes in the text?
You check the facts, and we answer for compliance with Wikipedia's rules. Nothing is published without your approval. We don't add an edit without a reliable source, because it won't survive editors' review.
When and how do I pay?
We fix the price and payment terms before the start. As standard, payment comes before work begins unless we agree otherwise. We accept SWIFT, SEPA, Wise, Payoneer, PayPal, Visa / Mastercard and USDT (TRC-20). Prices are in EUR, taxes included.
What if the article is declined?
We read the grounds. If the reason can be fixed, we fix it and resubmit, otherwise we offer another route: Wikidata, Simple English or another language edition. A published page is covered by the guarantee: up to three restoration attempts in the 90-day window or an 80% refund.
Who makes the decisions on Wikipedia?
Independent editors and administrators of each language edition. There is no single central moderator. We disclose paid editing on every project and take part in discussions under a disclosed account.
What does monitoring after publication include?
The first 90 days are part of the project: monitoring, support and guarantee. After that the page is on your balance. Wikimonitoring gives you alerts about edits, and any annual support package gives a 12-month guarantee.
Order a source assessment for a Wikipedia page: send a brief
Send a brief and we'll tell you which route is realistic for your project and what it will cost.
“Company N” is an illustrative name. The scenes on this page show the process. They are not real cases or screenshots.