24 Channel
UkraineGenerally considered a reliable news source in Ukraine.
Outil · gratuit, sans inscription
891 médias et catégories de sources avec la classification de travail de notre rédaction et le statut de la communauté Wikipedia (WP:RSP, novembre 2026) : fiables, situationnelles, sans consensus et celles à éviter. Recherche par nom, pays, thème ou tier.
// classification de travail de WikiBusines fondée sur le consensus de Wikipedia sur les sources fiables · pas une liste officielle de Wikipedia · révision 11.2026
United States
Articles by staff writers are generally reliable.
Compte si l’article est éditorial, indépendant de l’entreprise et substantiel.
United States
There is consensus that PR Newswire is generally unreliable, as press releases published on the site are not subject to editorial oversight.
Ne compte pas, même si le communiqué est paru dans un grand média : il n’y a pas de vérification éditoriale.
Global
Stronger for funded companies; lighter for fluff coverage.
Fiable avec réserves : nous évaluons l’article concret, pas le média dans son ensemble.
Global
Medium is a blog hosting service.
Ne compte pas : le texte est écrit par l’entreprise elle-même, il n’y a pas d’éditeur indépendant.
01891 médias
La notoriété sur Wikipedia dépend de la qualité des sources indépendantes, pas de leur nombre. La liste est un filtre rapide pour préparer vos sources et un test de réalité avant de commander un travail sur Wikipedia.
Affichés : 891 sur 891 médias et catégories de sources
Generally considered a reliable news source in Ukraine.
The A.V.
Generally reliable. Some editors consider it biased regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict.
A major Spanish national newspaper, generally reliable, with a conservative stance.
Australia's public broadcaster, a reliable source.
Generally reliable news division of ABC.
A major broadcaster in the Philippines, generally considered reliable for news.
A leading Norwegian newspaper of record, generally reliable.
The Age is a newspaper based in Melbourne, Australia.
One of the world's leading news agencies, generally reliable.
A leading Swiss newspaper, generally reliable.
Part of the Military Times group, generally reliable for military news.
Reliable, but biased on topics involving the Qatari government.
Generally reliable for facts, though an advocacy group.
A leading German-language business newspaper, reliable for economic topics.
A major center-left newspaper in South Korea, generally reliable.
Italy's leading news agency, generally considered reliable.
There is consensus that, outside the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the ADL is a generally reliable source, particularly for topics related to hate groups and…
In a 2022 RfC, there was consensus that Aon is generally reliable for weather-related articles.
A consortium of Germany's regional public-service broadcasters, generally considered reliable.
There is a rough consensus that Hardcore Gaming 101 is generally reliable for topics on video games, especially articles written by Kurt Kalata or John Szczepaniak.
Part of the Military Times group, generally reliable for military news.
Generally reliable for articles related to science and technology.
A respected public broadcaster known for quality cultural programming.
Leading Japanese newspaper, generally reliable.
One of the largest and most reputable news agencies.
Respected regional newspaper, generally reliable.
Generally reliable. Distinguish news from opinion.
Atlas Obscura's "articles" articles are professionally authored with editor oversight, and generally reliable.
Generally reliable, but some consider it biased.
AVN is considered generally reliable for the adult industry.
Generally reliable, but some consider it biased. Opinions should be attributed.
There is a consensus that Ballotpedia is generally reliable.
A major English-language newspaper in Thailand, generally reliable.
Generally reliable, including BBC News and documentaries.
There is consensus that Behind the Voice Actors is generally reliable for roles credits.
Generally reliable for news. Attribution is recommended.
A major Danish newspaper, generally considered reliable.
Generally reliable for news and business.
Major American newspaper, generally reliable.
A major think tank, generally reliable for its research and analysis.
Burke's Peerage is considered generally reliable for genealogy.
Reliability is situational. Culture section is generally reliable (Tier 1), other areas have no consensus.
Generally reliable. Ceased operations in May 2023.
A major think tank, generally reliable for its research and analysis.
Canada's public broadcaster, generally reliable.
Generally reliable news division of CBS.
Known for in-depth analysis, generally reliable.
Generally reliable, but may reflect a pro-government stance.
A major think tank, generally reliable for its research and analysis.
Check Your Fact is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network and considered generally reliable; despite its ownership under the deprecated Daily Caller, it has an…
Major American newspaper, generally reliable.
Major newspaper in South Korea, generally reliable.
Generally reliable for news.
The largest newspaper in Argentina, generally reliable.
Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change.
The 2025 RfC established a consensus that CNA, a Singaporean state-owned news channel, is a generally reliable source.
Generally reliable for business and financial news.
News content is reliable; talk show content is opinion.
A 2021 RfC found consensus that Coda Media is generally reliable for factual reporting.
There is consensus that Common Sense Media is generally reliable for entertainment reviews.
Generally reliable. Distinguish news from analysis.
Generally reliable. Publishes articles by academic experts.
A leading Italian newspaper of record, generally reliable.
A major think tank, generally reliable for its research and analysis.
Major Canadian broadcaster, news is generally reliable.
A leading Swedish newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Respected Kenyan newspaper, generally reliable.
Generally reliable, though some consider it politically biased.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
Pakistan's oldest English-language newspaper, generally reliable.
A leading Dutch newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Deadline Hollywood is considered generally reliable for entertainment-related articles.
There is consensus that Debrett's is reliable for genealogical information.
A major source for defense industry news, generally reliable.
There is a rough consensus that Den of Geek is generally reliable for entertainment-related topics.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
Highly reputable news magazine, generally reliable.
A major regional newspaper from Berlin, generally considered reliable.
The Deseret News is considered generally reliable for local news.
Germany's state-owned international broadcaster, reliable.
Generally considered a reliable source, known for its left-leaning perspective.
A major German national newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A well-respected German weekly newspaper, generally reliable for in-depth analysis.
There is consensus that Digital Spy is generally reliable for entertainment and popular culture.
There is consensus that Digital Trends is generally reliable due to its editorial standards and reputation.
There is consensus that The Diplomat is generally reliable.
Major newspaper in South Korea, generally reliable.
Denmark's public service broadcaster, generally reliable.
Generally reliable, especially for business news.
A major Brazilian newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Articles by staff writers are generally reliable.
Forbes.com articles published before 5 August 2010 (the date when contributors were introduced to the website) and any articles featured in print issue Forbes magazines are…
State-owned international news network, generally reliable.
A leading German newspaper of record, generally reliable.
NGO, generally reliable for its reports on democracy and human rights.
A registered charity and fact-checker, generally reliable.
Game Developer is considered generally reliable for subjects related to video games.
Game Informer is considered generally reliable for video games.
GameSpot is considered generally reliable for topics on video games.
A major Polish newspaper, generally considered reliable.
The Geographic Names Information System is a United States-based geographical database.
There is consensus that Gizmodo is generally reliable for technology, popular culture, and entertainment.
GLAAD is generally considered reliable for their area of expertise on LGBTQ topics.
Generally reliable. A Canadian newspaper of record.
There is consensus that GQ is generally reliable.
Generally reliable. Op-eds should be treated as opinions.
Respected independent newspaper in Nigeria, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Idolator is generally reliable for popular music.
There is consensus that IGN is generally reliable for entertainment and popular culture, as well as for film and video game reviews given that attribution is provided.
Leading Italian business newspaper, generally reliable.
Generally reliable for American politics.
Generally reliable.
A major British newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Major Indian English-language newspaper, generally reliable.
In the 2024 RfC, there was consensus that The Times of Israel is generally reliable, although potentially biased in certain topics like the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
Generally reliable. Some consider it politically biased.
Major Indian newspaper, generally reliable.
Indian newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Leading Indian English-language daily, generally reliable.
The Inter Press Service is a news agency.
There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news.
The Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) reviews fact-checking organizations according to a code of principles.
Ireland's newspaper of record, generally reliable.
News coverage from the broadcaster is generally reliable.
Leading English-language newspaper, generally reliable.
JAMA is a peer-reviewed medical journal published by the American Medical Association.
Oldest English-language daily in Japan, generally reliable.
Generally reliable, but use with caution for extraordinary claims on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Major newspaper in South Korea, generally reliable.
A major Danish newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A leading Greek newspaper, generally reliable.
The public broadcaster of South Korea, generally considered reliable.
Most content by Kirkus Reviews is considered to be generally reliable.
Kommersant is a liberal business broadsheet newspaper with nationwide distribution in the Russian Federation.
A leading Indonesian national newspaper, generally considered reliable.
Reliable, independent English-language reporting on Ukraine.
Long-standing English-language newspaper, generally reliable.
Major nonprofit news agency in Japan, generally reliable.
A leading Peruvian newspaper, generally reliable.
A major Colombian newspaper, generally reliable.
A leading conservative newspaper in Chile, generally reliable.
A major Spanish national newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A leading newspaper of record in Spain, generally reliable.
Colombia's largest newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A major Mexican newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A leading newspaper of record in Argentina, generally reliable.
Major French-language news source, generally reliable.
Generally considered a reliable source and a major national newspaper in Italy.
A major Italian national newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A major Spanish newspaper, generally considered reliable.
A major French newspaper, generally reliable.
A leading newspaper of record in France, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Le Monde diplomatique is generally reliable.
Generally considered a reliable source for news in France.
Major Mexican media company, its news division is generally reliable.
A major French newspaper, generally reliable, with a center-left stance.
Generally reliable.
The largest subscription newspaper in Finland, generally considered reliable.
Journalistic articles written for LWN.net are generally considered reliable as a source of information on free and open source software and issues of interest to that community…
Known for investigative journalism, generally reliable.
One of the major newspapers in Japan, generally considered reliable.
There is consensus that The Mary Sue is generally reliable.
Major South Korean broadcaster, generally reliable.
Meduza is a news outlet run by Russian dissidents.
Metacritic is considered generally reliable for its review aggregation and its news articles on film, TV, and video games.
Major Indian business newspaper, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Mother Jones is generally reliable.
There is consensus that MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) is generally reliable.
There is consensus that National Geographic is generally reliable.
Generally reliable but has a clear conservative slant.
Major US broadcaster, its news division is generally reliable.
There is consensus that NBC News is generally reliable for news.
The Encyclopædia Iranica is considered generally reliable for Iran-related topics.
Major Indian news broadcaster, generally reliable.
Highly respected Swiss newspaper, generally reliable.
There is consensus that The New Republic is generally reliable.
There is consensus that New York magazine, including its subsidiary website Vulture, is generally reliable.
Most editors consider the content of New York Daily News articles to be generally reliable.
A leading newspaper of record, generally reliable.
There is consensus that The New Yorker is generally reliable.
New Zealand's largest newspaper, generally reliable.
Major South African news website, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Newslaundry is generally reliable.
There is a consensus that NewsNation is generally reliable for matters not related to UFOs or UAPs.
There is consensus that articles from Newsweek pre-2013 are generally reliable for news covered during that time.
Engadget is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles.
Japan's public broadcaster, generally reliable.
The world's largest financial newspaper, generally reliable for business news.
There is consensus that British publication NME is generally reliable for content related to its areas of expertise, which include music.
Dutch public broadcaster, generally reliable.
A leading Dutch newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Norwegian public broadcaster, generally reliable.
Entertainment Weekly is considered generally reliable for entertainment-related articles.
A major Brazilian newspaper, generally reliable.
OKO.press is a Polish investigative journalism and fact-checking website.
There is consensus that The Hollywood Reporter is generally reliable for entertainment-related topics, including its articles and reviews on film, TV and music, as well as its…
There is a clear consensus that Hope Not Hate (HNH) is generally reliable for factual content.
Austria's public service broadcaster, generally reliable.
One of Canada's largest daily newspapers, generally reliable.
Most editors consider TorrentFreak generally reliable on topics involving file sharing.
Major Texas newspaper, generally considered reliable.
Generally reliable.
There is consensus that People magazine can be a reliable source in biographies of living persons, but the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented…
There is consensus that People Make Games is generally reliable for the topic of video games, although care should be taken if using the source for WP:BLP-related information due…
There is consensus that the Pew Research Center is generally reliable.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
One of the largest newspapers in the Philippines, generally reliable.
There is rough consensus that PinkNews is generally reliable for factual reporting, but additional considerations may apply and caution should be used.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Playboy is generally reliable.
Generally reliable.
Generally reliable for coverage of European politics.
PolitiFact is a reliable source for reporting the veracity of statements made by political candidates as well as the percentage of false statements made by a political candidate…
Major Danish newspaper, generally reliable.
Polygon is considered generally reliable for video games and pop culture related topics during its ownership by Vox Media.
There is a strong consensus that ProPublica is generally reliable for all purposes because it has an excellent reputation for fact-checking and accuracy, is widely cited by…
The largest daily newspaper in Bangladesh, generally considered reliable.
Generally reliable for business and technology news.
Radio Free Asia can be generally considered a reliable source.
Italy's state-owned public broadcaster, generally considered reliable.
Major online news website, known for investigative journalism.
There is consensus that Reason is generally reliable for news and facts.
Brazil's largest commercial TV network, news is generally reliable.
The Register is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles.
One of the world's leading news agencies, generally reliable.
There is consensus that Rolling Stone has generally reliable coverage on culture matters (i.e., films, music, entertainment, etc.).
Rotten Tomatoes is considered generally reliable for its review aggregation and its news articles on film and TV.
Spain's state-owned public broadcaster, generally reliable.
A major Polish newspaper, generally considered reliable.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
Scientific American is considered generally reliable for popular science content.
In a 2021 RfC, there was strong consensus that SCOTUSblog is generally reliable for law-related topics.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
Sixth Tone is usable for general non-political topics, such as Chinese society and culture.
A 2022 RfC established reasonably clear consensus that Skeptical Inquirer is generally reliable.
A major news broadcaster, generally reliable.
Generally reliable for fact-checking.
Reliable, but caution advised on politically sensitive topics due to Alibaba ownership.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is considered generally reliable on topics related to hate groups and extremism in the United States.
Space.com may be reliable for astronomy and spaceflight news, and has a reputation for being generally accurate.
Generally reliable for sports coverage.
There is a consensus that work by Sports Illustrated pre-acquisition by Maven Networks in June 2019 is considered generally reliable for sports-related news.
Swiss public broadcaster, generally reliable.
A major Brazilian newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Major English-language newspaper, generally reliable.
Major newspaper, generally reliable.
Major Singaporean newspaper, generally reliable but can be pro-government.
Major Swedish newspaper, generally reliable.
Swedish public broadcaster, generally reliable.
Major Australian newspaper, generally reliable.
A leading German newspaper of record, generally reliable.
There is consensus that U.S.
Highly respected Ukrainian online newspaper.
NGO, generally reliable for its reports on human rights.
There is a consensus that Eurogamer is generally reliable for topics on video games.
Pan-European news broadcaster, generally reliable.
Generally reliable.
TV Guide is considered generally reliable for television-related topics.
Generally reliable independent Russian news source.
Vanity Fair is considered generally reliable, including for popular culture topics.
As an entertainment trade magazine, Variety is considered a reliable source in its field.
There is consensus among editors that The Village Voice is generally reliable.
Vogue is considered generally reliable.
Voice of America is an American state-owned international radio broadcaster.
Generally reliable for explanatory journalism.
A leading newspaper of record, generally reliable.
Most editors considered the Washington Free Beacon to have become generally reliable during the editorship of Eliana Johnson.
A leading newspaper of record, generally reliable.
The Weekly Standard was considered generally reliable, but much of their published content was opinion and should be attributed as such.
The Wire is considered generally reliable under the news organizations guideline.
Generally reliable for technology and culture topics.
As an industry trade publication, there is consensus that TheWrap is a good source for entertainment news and media analysis.
Yahoo!
Largest circulation newspaper in the world, generally reliable.
Germany's national public television broadcaster, generally reliable.
ZDNet is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles prior to its acquisition by Red Ventures in October 2020.
Stronger for funded companies; lighter for fluff coverage.
Forbes Contributor pieces are NOT independent and don't count.
Paywalled but reliable.
General repositories like Academia.edu, HAL Open Archives, ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and Zenodo host academic papers, conference proceedings, book chapters, preprints,…
There is consensus that Al Arabiya is a usable source for topics unrelated to the Saudi Arabian government.
Shares the general reliability and biases of its parent network.
State-owned. Reliability is situational on political topics.
The 2024 RfC established no consensus on the reliability of Al-Manar.
Alexa Internet was a web traffic analysis company owned by Amazon and discontinued as of May 2022.
News aggregator, reliability depends on the original source.
AllSides is an American company that estimates the bias of sources.
The American Conservative is published by the American Ideas Institute, an advocacy organisation.
Generally unreliable for political topics; often described as a mouthpiece for the Turkish government.
As a transcript of parliament proceedings in the United Kingdom, Hansard is a primary source and its statements should be attributed to whoever made them.
The ADL can roughly be taken as reliable on the topic of antisemitism when Israel and Zionism are not concerned, and its reliability on antisemitism is a case-by-case matter.
No consensus. Was considered usable for Hong Kong topics but shut down in 2021.
There is consensus that Arab News is a usable source for topics unrelated to the Saudi Arabian government.
A major sports newspaper. Reliable for sports coverage.
Asian News International is an Indian news agency.
There is no consensus on the reliability of AskMen.
ARDA is an archive repository of information pertaining to religion.
There is consensus that use of Australian Strategic Policy Institute should be evaluated for due weight and accompanied with in text attribution when used.
There is consensus that Heavy.com should not be relied upon for any serious or contentious statements, including dates of birth.
Bloomberg company and executive profiles are generally considered to be based on company press releases and should only be used as a source for uncontroversial information.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Boing Boing.
There is consensus that the reliability of Bustle is unclear and that its reliability should be decided on an instance-by-instance basis.
Editors find the quality of BuzzFeed articles to be highly inconsistent.
The Cato Institute is considered generally reliable for its opinion.
The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an economic policy think tank.
State-owned. Use with caution for PRC's position.
There is no consensus on the reliability of The Christian Broadcasting Network.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Cosmopolitan.
TED content (from ted.com or youtube.com) may be valid RS, assuming the speaker is considered reliable and an expert on what they are talking about.
There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast.
There is no consensus regarding the general reliability of The Daily Dot, though it is considered fine for citing non-contentious claims of fact.
Tabloid, generally unreliable for factual reporting.
The Daily NK is an online newspaper based in South Korea that reports on stories based inside of North Korea.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Democracy Now!.
There is a consensus that Destructoid is marginally reliable for topics on video games.
Dexerto is a website covering gaming news, internet personalities, and entertainment.
Dotdash Meredith (formerly known as About.com) operates a network of websites.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.
The Free Press is a media company founded by Bari Weiss as a counter-mainstream media publication.
Song lyrics, annotations and descriptions on Genius are mostly user-generated content and are thus generally unreliable.
The GEOnet Names Server is a United States-based geographical database that covers non-U.S.
Google Maps and Google Street View may be useful for some purposes, including finding and verifying geographic coordinates and other basic information like street names.
Primary source — good for facts, weak for notability.
There is no consensus on the reliability of The Green Papers.
Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight.
There is consensus that world records verified by Guinness World Records should not be used to establish notability.
There is no consensus on the reliability of the Independent Journal Review.
Counts when truly independent. Many trade pubs are sponsored.
Discussions of ThinkProgress are dated, with the most recent in 2013.
IslamQA.info is a Q&A site on Salafism founded and supervised by Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid.
Jacobin is a U.S.-based magazine that describes itself as a @media screen{html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .mw-parser-output .inline-quote-talk{color:#00B785}}@media screen and…
In the 2024 RfC, there was consensus that The Jewish Chronicle is generally reliable for news until 2015.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Jezebel.
La Patilla is considered marginally reliable as a news source covering Venezuela, with several additional considerations.
A major sports newspaper. Reliable for sports coverage.
In a 2021 RfC, editors achieved a consensus that while non-sponsored content from Mashable is generally fine, Mashable tends towards less formal writing and is geared at a…
Publications in MDPI journals are considered questionable.
There is consensus that Media Matters is marginally reliable and that its articles should be evaluated for reliability on a case-by-case basis.
There is some consensus that Mediaite is only marginally reliable, and should be avoided where better sources are available.
MetalSucks is considered usable for its reviews and news articles.
The reliability of MEMRI is considered to lie between no consensus and generally unreliable.
There is no consensus over the reliability of Middle East Monitor (MEMO).
A major Turkish newspaper, but its reliability on political topics is considered situational.
Mondoweiss is a news website operated by the Center for Economic Research and Social Change (CERSC), an advocacy organization.
The Morning Star describes itself as a British "reader-owned co-operative and unique as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media" and has low circulation.
News reporting is reliable (Tier 1), but opinion/talk show content is partisan and must be attributed.
There is no consensus on the reliability of TMZ.
There is no consensus on the reliability of National Review.
Encyclopedia Astronautica is a website on space history.
Encyclopedia.com is a content aggregator.
There is no consensus regarding the reliability of the Encyclopædia Britannica (including its online edition, Encyclopædia Britannica Online).
There is consensus that additional considerations apply when considering whether the use of The Needle Drop as a source is appropriate.
There is consensus that the New York Post (nypost.com ) and its sub-publications Decider (decider.com ) and Page Six are considered to be marginally reliable sources for…
Unlike articles before 2013, Newsweek articles since 2013 are not generally reliable.
There is no consensus on the reliability of The Next Web.
There is no consensus for the reliability of Entrepreneur Magazine, although there is a consensus that "contributor" pieces in the publication should be treated as…
A major news channel in Afghanistan. Reliability is situational, especially after the Taliban takeover.
As of 2010, a few editors commented that opinion pieces in Townhall are reliable as a source for the opinion of the author of the individual piece, although they may not be…
Its independence has been questioned since a change in ownership in 2018.
In May 2025, Vox Media sold Polygon to Valnet and promptly laid off most Polygon staff; as of May 2025, this event's long-term impact on reliability is unknown.
In the 2025 RfC, editors raised concerns over Popular Mechanics's coverage of UFO/UAP topics, regarding their promotion of fringe topics and coverage of UFOs.
There is consensus that Pride.com is marginally reliable and that its articles should be evaluated for reliability on a case-by-case basis.
A left-wing newspaper; reliable for facts but attribution is required for its political stance.
Articles written by Stephen Barrett on Quackwatch are considered generally reliable (as Barrett is a subject-matter expert) and self-published (as there is disagreement on the…
US-funded, generally reliable, though can have a pro-US perspective.
There is no consensus as to RealClearPolitics's reliability.
RhythmOne (which acquired All Media Guide, formerly AllRovi) has operated the websites AllMusic, AllMovie (until 2024), and AllGame (defunct).
RIA Novosti was an official news agency of the Russian government.
Consensus exists that TRT World is reliable for statements regarding the official views of the Turkish government but not reliable for subjects with which the Turkish government…
There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon.
Additional considerations apply to the use of Science-Based Medicine.
ScienceBlogs is an invitation-only network of blogs.
There is consensus that Screen Rant is a marginally reliable source.
In the 2020 RfC, Sherdog was determined to be not self-published and can be used for basic information on MMA fighters and matches.
The Skeptic's Dictionary is a book by Robert Todd Carroll that expanded into a website.
In the 2022 RfC, there is a consensus that additional considerations apply to Sky News Australia, and that it should not be used to substantiate any exceptional claims.
Generally reliable, but often opinionated.
Editors consider Social Blade, a social media analytics website, reliable when it comes to objective statistics and data.
The South African was ruled as no-consensus on reliability in the 2024 RfC, however there have been issues relating to plagiarism from Wikipedia within some articles.
SparkNotes is a study guide.
The Spectator primarily consists of opinion pieces and these should be judged by WP:RSOPINION, WP:RSEDITORIAL, and WP:NEWSBLOG.
There is a consensus that at least some articles by Sports Illustrated post-acquisition by Maven Networks in June 2019 are considered unreliable.
Only when the expert is independently notable.
Non-political content is generally reliable (Tier 1). Political content is situational due to bias.
Editors consider Human Events biased or opinionated, and its statements should be attributed.
Major Ukrainian news agency, reliability can be situational.
EMHRM is an advocacy organization on a controversial topic, and should be used with attribution.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Us Weekly.
No consensus on reliability. Considered more reliable than most British tabloids.
There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat.
There is no consensus on the reliability of Vice Media publications.
A major Vietnamese online newspaper. Use with caution for political topics due to state control of media.
There is no consensus on the reliability of the Washington Examiner, but there is consensus that it should not be used to substantiate exceptional claims.
There is consensus that The Washington Times is a marginally reliable source for politics and science.
Uniquely among WMF sites, Wikidata's statements can be directly transcluded into articles; this is usually done to provide external links or infobox data.
Additional considerations apply to the use of the World Christian Database, World Christian Encyclopedia, and World Religion Database.
The World Socialist Web Site is the online news and information publication of the International Committee of the Fourth International, a Trotskyist political organisation.
XBIZ is considered generally reliable for the adult industry.
Xinhua News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China.
Reliability is situational, especially on political topics.
112 Ukraine was deprecated following a 2019 RfC, which showed overwhelming consensus for the deprecation of a slew of sources associated with Russian disinformation in Ukraine.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable for factual reporting.
Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a self-published source with little to no editorial oversight.
There is consensus that Ad Fontes Media and their Media Bias Chart should not be used in article space in reference to sources' political leaning or reliability.
Advameg operates content farms, including City-Data, that use scraped or improperly licensed content.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable for factual reporting.
Taki's Magazine was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that it is an unreliable opinion magazine that should be avoided outside of very limited exceptions (e.g.
Al Mayadeen is a Lebanese pan-Arabist news channel.
In the 2024 RfC, editors generally agreed that Al-Manar is generally unreliable for topics that are controversial, especially with regards to the Arab–Israeli conflict.
AllMovie, previously owned by RhythmOne, is a movie database.
A partisan source; its statements should be attributed.
Healthline is a medical resource that is substantially written by non-expert freelance writers and reviewed by non-expert advisors.
User reviews on Amazon are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all.
There is consensus that An Phoblacht is generally unreliable for news reporting, as it is a publication of Sinn Féin.
Ancestry.com is a genealogy site that hosts a database of primary source documents including marriage and census records.
ANNA News was deprecated in the 2022 RfC.
Answers.com (previously known as WikiAnswers) is a Q&A site that incorporates user-generated content.
There is consensus that the ADL is a generally unreliable source for the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, due to significant evidence that the ADL acts as a pro-Israeli advocacy…
There is consensus that Antiwar.com is generally unreliable.
Army Recognition is a site that reproduces press release material without any original reportage.
Tasnim News Agency was deprecated in the 2024 RfC due to being an outlet controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps that disseminates Iranian state propaganda and…
State-owned news agency, generally unreliable for political topics.
Although Heat Street was owned by Dow Jones & Company, a usually reputable publisher, many editors note that Heat Street does not clearly differentiate between its news articles…
Atlas Obscura's "places" articles are user-generated and user-editable with minimal oversight, and the site's terms of use includes disclaimers about user submissions.
Baidu Baike was deprecated in the 2020 RfC as it is similar to an open wiki, which is a type of self-published source.
There is consensus that Benzinga does not have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy and often does not disclose sponsored content, and so is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that Best Gore is a shock site with no credibility.
German tabloid, generally unreliable.
Blaze Media (including TheBlaze) is considered generally unreliable for facts.
A Swiss tabloid, generally considered unreliable.
Blogger is a blog hosting service that owns the blogspot.com domain.
Deprecated and blacklisted. Publishes falsehoods.
BroadwayWorld is considered generally unreliable, as it contains many articles that reproduce press releases, disguising this as authentic journalism.
There is consensus that The California Globe is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that The Canary is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that Catholic-Hierarchy.org is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that CelebrityNetWorth is generally unreliable.
Due to persistent abuse, Global Research is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
CESNUR is an apologia site for new religious movements, and thus is inherently unreliable in its core area due to conflicts of interest.
Deprecated. State propaganda outlet.
Change.org is a website specializing in the creation of online petitions.
China Global Television Network was deprecated in the 2020 RfC for publishing false or fabricated information.
Generally unreliable since Nov 2022 due to AI-generated articles. Was reliable before Oct 2020.
There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish notability for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources.
Primary source — facts only, not notability.
There is consensus that Consortium News is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that Correo del Orinoco is generally unreliable because it is used to amplify misleading and/or false information.
CounterPunch is a left-wing political opinion magazine.
Cracked.com is a humor website.
The Cradle is an online magazine focusing on West Asia/Middle East-related topics.
In the 2019 RfC, there was consensus to deprecate Crunchbase, but also to continue allowing external links to the website.
Useful for facts but not for notability — they list everyone.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable for factual reporting.
The Daily Caller was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that the site publishes false or fabricated information.
Tabloid, generally unreliable.
There is consensus that Daily Kos should generally be avoided as a source, especially for controversial political topics where better sources are available.
In the 2017 RfC, the Daily Mail was the first source to be deprecated on Wikipedia, and the decision was challenged and reaffirmed in the 2019 RfC.
Deprecated for poor fact-checking and sensationalism.
Daily Sabah is considered to be a propaganda outlet that publishes pro-Turkish government news which aims to strengthen Erdoğan's rule, spread Westernophobia, and promote Turkish…
The Daily Star was deprecated in the 2020 RfC due to its reputation for publishing false or fabricated information.
There is a strong consensus that The Daily Wire is generally unreliable for factual reporting.
The largest Dutch daily, often considered a tabloid and thus unreliable for facts.
In the 2025 RfC, there was clear and overwhelming consensus that The Debrief and its author Micah Hanks are generally unreliable and deprecated as a fringe source that lacks…
DeviantArt is considered a self-published source, where registered users can upload content such as art, videos and text.
The content on Discogs is user-generated, and is therefore generally unreliable.
There is consensus that Distractify is generally unreliable.
There is consensus The Dorchester Review is generally unreliable, as it is not peer reviewed by the wider academic community.
Facebook is considered generally unreliable because it is a self-published source with no editorial oversight.
Polish tabloid, generally unreliable.
FamilySearch operates a genealogy site that incorporates a large amount of user-generated content.
Due to persistent abuse, Famous Birthdays is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Fandom (formerly Wikia and Wikicities) wikis are considered generally unreliable because open wikis are self-published sources.
Far Out is considered generally unreliable as a churnalism outlet that appears to engage in circular sourcing.
The Federalist is generally unreliable for facts due to its partisan nature and its promotion of conspiracy theories.
FilmAffinity is considered generally unreliable, as the site mostly consists of user-generated content.
The content on Find a Grave is user-generated, and is therefore considered generally unreliable.
Findmypast is a genealogy site that hosts transcribed primary source documents, which is covered under WP:BLPPRIMARY.
Flags of the World has been written off as an unreliable source in general.
Most photos on Flickr are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all for verifying information in articles (although properly-licensed photos from…
User-generated content, not Forbes/Inc editorial.
Generally unreliable for politics and science. Non-political content is Tier 2.
In the 2020 RfC, there was unanimous consensus to deprecate FrontPage Magazine.
The Gateway Pundit was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that the site is unacceptable as a source.
Gawker (2002–2016) was a gossip blog that frequently published articles on rumors and speculation without named authors.
There is consensus that GB News is generally unreliable.
Genealogy.eu (genealogy.euweb.cz) was deprecated in the 2025 RfC due to persistent misuse.
Geni.com was deprecated in the 2025 RfC due to its persistent misuse and limited utility.
The Geographic Names Information System is a United States-based geographical database.
The GEOnet Names Server is a United States-based geographical database that covers non-U.S.
The Global Times is a tabloid owned by the Chinese Communist Party.
GlobalSecurity.org is an unreliable user-contributed and scraper site given to plagiarism.
GoFundMe is a crowdfunding website specializing in funding for certain life events.
Goodreads is a social cataloging site comprising user-generated content.
The Grayzone was deprecated in the 2020 RfC.
The Guido Fawkes website (order-order.com) is considered generally unreliable because it is a self-published blog.
As a social networking service, TikTok is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC.
The content on IMDb is user-generated, and the site is considered unreliable by a majority of editors.
iNaturalist, a "social network of naturalists, citizen scientists, and biologists built on the concept of mapping and sharing observations of biodiversity across the globe", is…
Indiegogo is a crowdfunding website specializing in funding for start-up charities or businesses.
The Independent Media Center is an open publishing network.
Due to persistent abuse, Infowars is on both the Wikipedia spam blacklist and the Wikimedia global spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Inquisitr is a news aggregator, although it does publish some original reporting.
As a social networking service, Instagram is covered by the following policies and guidelines: WP:SOCIALMEDIA, WP:RSSELF, WP:SPS and WP:UGC.
There is consensus that the International Business Times is generally unreliable.
Investopedia is a tertiary source on finances, owned by Dotdash.
HispanTV was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed overwhelming consensus that the TV channel is generally unreliable and sometimes broadcasts outright fabrications.
Most editors consider History Channel generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for accuracy and its tendency to broadcast programs that promote conspiracy theories.
The Jewish Virtual Library is a partisan source which sometimes cites Wikipedia and it is mostly unreliable, especially in its "Myths & Facts" section.
Jihad Watch was deprecated in the 2021 RfC; of the editors who commented on the substance of the proposal, they were unanimous that the source is unreliable.
The Joshua Project is an ethnological database created to support Christian missions.
The Journal of Scientific Exploration is published by the Society for Scientific Exploration, which has been criticized for advancing fringe ideas.
JRank is considered a search engine or content farm, and is thus considered generally unreliable.
Kickstarter is a crowdfunding website specializing in funding for new works of fiction.
Know Your Meme entries, including "confirmed" entries, are user-generated and generally unreliable.
Austrian tabloid, generally considered unreliable.
A Danish tabloid, generally considered unreliable.
A daily tabloid newspaper, generally unreliable.
A Belgian tabloid, generally considered unreliable.
Along with sister sites GAMINGbible, SPORTbible, Tyla, and UNILAD, LADbible publishes news, entertainment, and celebrity interviews.
Due to it being a self-published source, Land Transport Guru is considered generally unreliable.
Last.fm was deprecated in the 2019 RfC.
There is consensus that The Electronic Intifada is generally unreliable with respect to its reputation for accuracy, fact-checking, and error-correction.
Due to persistent abuse, Lenta.ru is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links to articles published on or after 12 March 2014 must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Telesur was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that the TV channel is a Bolivarian propaganda outlet.
LifeSiteNews was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that the site publishes false or fabricated information.
LinkedIn is a social network.
Self-publishing platform.
LionhearTV is a blog owned by eMVP Digital.
LiveJournal is a blog hosting service.
Due to persistent abuse, LiveLeak is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Due to persistent abuse, Lulu.com is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
There is clear and substantial consensus that the Mail on Sunday is generally unreliable, and a slightly narrower consensus that the source should be deprecated.
Marquis Who's Who, including its publication Who's Who in America, is considered generally unreliable.
In the RfC, editors achieved a consensus that extra attention needs to be paid when it comes to sponsored content, especially ensuring that the content was written by Mashable…
MEAWW is a tabloid site covering pop culture and the internet.
There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published.
There is consensus that the Media Research Center and its subdivisions (e.g.
Medium is a blog hosting service.
Metal-experience.com was determined to be generally unreliable for factual reporting.
A free tabloid newspaper; often considered unreliable.
MintPress News was deprecated in the 2019 RfC, which showed consensus that the site publishes false or fabricated information.
Reliability has been severely compromised since the 2021 coup.
Due to persistent abuse, MyLife is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
The National Enquirer is a supermarket tabloid that is considered generally unreliable.
Due to persistent abuse, Natural News is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Encyclopaedia Metallum was deprecated by unanimous consensus in the 2025 RfC as a site rife with user-generated content and thus no hope of reliability.
There is consensus that The New American is generally unreliable for factual reporting.
In the 2022 RfC, there is consensus to deprecate New Eastern Outlook.
There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics.
News of the World was deprecated in the 2019 RfC.
NewsBlaze was unanimously deprecated by snowball clause consensus in the 2021 RfC.
NewsBreak is a news aggregator that publishes snippets of articles from other sources.
Due to persistent abuse, NewsFront is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Newsmax was deprecated by snowball clause consensus in the November 2020 RfC.
There is a consensus that NewsNation is generally unreliable for the topic of UFOs or UAPs.
There is a consensus that NGO Monitor is not reliable for facts.
There is consensus that Ethnicity of Celebs (ethnicelebs.com) is generally unreliable as user-generated content with no claim of accuracy or fact-checking.
NNDB is a biographical database operated by Soylent Communications, the parent company of shock site Rotten.com.
In the 2018 RfC, there was clear consensus to deprecate Occupy Democrats as a source à la the Daily Mail.
Any platforms operated by the Office of Cuba Broadcasting of the U.S.
In the 2019 RfC, there was clear consensus to deprecate One America News Network as a source à la the Daily Mail.
The Onion is a satirical news website, and should not be used as a source for facts.
Due to persistent abuse, OpIndia is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
A tabloid, generally considered unreliable.
Our Campaigns is considered generally unreliable due to its publishing of user-generated content.
There is consensus that the PanAm Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting.
Patheos is a website that hosts a collection of blogs.
Two RfCs found consensus that certain self-published peerage websites are not reliable for genealogical information and should be deprecated.
Official newspaper of the CCP. Unreliable for facts.
Due to concerns centered around the reliability of box office numbers and lack of authenticity, in the 2025 RfC, there was consensus that Pinkvilla is generally unreliable.
Although Planespotters.net has been widely used for aviation articles, there is consensus that it is generally unreliable.
The Epoch Times was deprecated in the 2019 RfC.
In the 2026 RfC, The Points Guy was deprecated based on concerns about the site's native marketing and affiliate revenue model.
There is consensus that The Post Millennial is generally unreliable.
There is consensus that PR Newswire is generally unreliable, as press releases published on the site are not subject to editorial oversight.
Press release distribution. Zero editorial review.
Preprint repositories, like arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, PeerJ Preprints, Preprints.org, and SSRN contain papers that have undergone moderation, but not necessarily peer review.
In the 2020 RfC, editors found a clear consensus to deprecate Press TV, owing to its status as an Iranian government propaganda outlet that publishes disinformation, conspiracy…
Due to persistent abuse, Project Veritas is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Most editors consider Quadrant generally unreliable for factual reporting.
There is consensus that Quillette is generally unreliable for facts, with non-trivial minorities arguing for either full deprecation or "considerations apply".
Quora is a Q&A site.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable.
Rate Your Music was deprecated in the 2019 RfC.
There is consensus that Raw Story is generally unreliable for factual reporting, based upon a pattern of publishing false and sensationalized stories.
There is consensus that the online properties of Red Ventures are generally unreliable post-acquisition.
Reddit is a social news and discussion website.
There is consensus that RedState should not be used as a source of facts.
Scriptural texts, like the Bible and the Quran, are primary sources only suitable for attributed, relevant quotes and in compliance with other Wikipedia content policies and…
In the 2021 RfC, there was a consistent and overwhelming consensus to deprecate Republic TV.
Due to security concerns, The Heritage Foundation is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist: there is evidence that the group has planned to doxx Wikipedia editors, and links to it…
There is unanimous consensus among editors that Culture Council articles (of URL form rollingstone.com/culture-council/*) are self-published sources and are, in most aspects,…
According to a 2021 RfC discussion, there is unanimous consensus among editors that Rolling Stone is generally unreliable for politically and societally sensitive issues reported…
The 2022 RfC found a consensus to deprecate Royal Central on the grounds that it lacked serious editorial standards and hosted plagiarized content.
Turkish state broadcaster, generally unreliable for political topics.
There is consensus that RT is an unreliable source, publishes false or fabricated information, and should be deprecated.
The Truth About Guns is a group blog.
A Turkish daily newspaper with close ties to the government, generally considered unreliable for political topics.
ScienceDirect is an online bibliographical database run by Elsevier.
Scribd operates a self-publishing platform for documents and audiobooks.
Simple Flying was deprecated in the 2025 RfC.
Sixth Tone is published by the Shanghai United Media Group, which is government-controlled.
The Skwawkbox is considered generally unreliable because it is self-published.
As an open wiki, SourceWatch is considered generally unreliable.
Due to persistent abuse, SouthFront is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Spirit of Metal is considered a self-published source and generally unreliable.
Paid placement — not independent.
Sportskeeda is considered generally unreliable due to a consensus that there is little or no editorial oversight over the website's content, which is largely user-written.
There is consensus that Sputnik is an unreliable source that publishes false or fabricated information, and should be deprecated as in the 2017 RfC of the Daily Mail.
Stack Exchange is a network of Q&A sites, including Stack Overflow, MathOverflow, and Ask Ubuntu.
There is consensus that StarsUnfolded is unreliable as it is a self-published source.
Statista aggregates statistical information from a number of sources, many of which are reliable.
Tabloid, deprecated and unreliable.
Due to persistent abuse, Swarajya is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Until 2018, the U.S.
Universe Guide was deprecated by consensus in the 2024 RfC.
The Unz Review was deprecated by WP:SnowPro consensus in the 2021 RfC.
EurAsia Daily frequently produces false claims to advance their Kremlin-aligned viewpoints and was deprecated following a 2023 RfC.
The EurAsian Times is an Indo-Canadian news portal, considered to be generally unreliable for a lack of fact-checking and accuracy, usually containing churnalism or otherwise…
Urban Dictionary is considered generally unreliable, because it consists solely of user-generated content.
TV Tropes is considered generally unreliable because it is an open wiki, which is a type of self-published source.
TV.com was largely user-generated and generally unreliable.
VDARE was deprecated in the 2018 RfC.
There is consensus that Venezuelanalysis is generally unreliable.
Due to persistent abuse, Veterans Today is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable for factual reporting.
In the 2019 RfC, editors unanimously agreed that VGChartz is generally unreliable.
The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation is an American anti-communist think tank and blog, considered to be an unreliable source due to misinformation and a generally poor…
The Voltaire Network is considered unreliable due to its affiliation with conspiracy theorist Thierry Meyssan and its republication of articles from Global Research.
Polish state broadcaster, considered unreliable for political topics due to government influence.
Most editors considered the Washington Free Beacon to be generally unreliable as a source during the editorship of Matthew Continetti, particularly for material about BLPs or…
WatchMojo is a site that publishes Internet videos consisting of ranking listicles.
We Got This Covered is generally unreliable due to its lack of editorial oversight, publication of unsubstantiated or false rumors, speculation claimed as fact, and accepting…
Weather2Travel is a website operated by UK-based Global Support Limited.
Wen Wei Po is a newspaper owned by the government of Hong Kong.
In the 2019 RfC, there was consensus that The Western Journal is generally unreliable, but no consensus on whether The Western Journal should be deprecated.
WhatCulture is considered generally unreliable.
Who's Who (UK) is considered generally unreliable due to its poor editorial standards and history of publishing false or inaccurate information.
WhoSampled is almost entirely composed of user-generated content, and is a self-published source.
Wikidata is largely user-generated, and articles should not directly cite Wikidata as a source (just as it would be inappropriate to cite other Wikipedias' articles as sources).
WikiLeaks is a repository of primary source documents leaked by anonymous sources.
Most editors believe that Wikinews articles do not meet Wikipedia's verifiability standards.
Wikipedia itself is not an appropriate source because open wikis are self-published sources.
WordPress.com is a blog hosting service that runs on the WordPress software.
WorldNetDaily was deprecated in the 2018 RfC.
Worldometer is a self-published source and editors have questioned its accuracy and methodology.
X (formerly known as Twitter before July 2023) is a social network.
Due to persistent abuse, Examiner.com is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
A tabloid newspaper, generally considered unreliable for factual reporting.
Most videos on YouTube are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used as a reference.
ZDNet was acquired by digital marketing company Red Ventures in October 2020.
Zero Hedge was deprecated in the 2020 RfC due to its propagation of conspiracy theories.
Due to persistent abuse, ZoomInfo is currently on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used.
Ce média ne figure pas dans la liste. Essayez un autre nom, pays ou thème, ou écrivez-nous : nous évaluerons le média.
TierTier 1 · fiableTier 2 · avec réservesTier 3 · situationnelPas de consensusÀ éviter
Statut WP:RSPgénéralement fiablepas de consensusgénéralement non fiabledeprecatedsur liste noiremixtecatégorie de sources
Statuts communautaires : Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, CC BY-SA 4.0, révision de 11.2026 ; les tiers sont la classification de travail de WikiBusines, pas une liste officielle ni une garantie.
Les noms, pays et notes sont en anglais, comme dans notre jeu de données. L’année indiquée à côté du statut est celle de la dernière discussion de la source par la communauté.
Audit de notoriété →Publications dans les médias →
02Tiers et statuts
Chaque média a l’un des cinq tiers : c’est l’évaluation de travail de notre rédaction. La sixième carte regroupe les statuts communautaires WP:RSP, une échelle distincte. Un clic sur une carte ouvre les médias correspondants dans la recherche ci-dessus.
Sources fiables : le guide complet →Publications dans les médias →
03Comment lire
Il s’agit de la classification de travail de notre rédaction, fondée sur le consensus de la communauté Wikipedia, pas d’une liste officielle ni d’une garantie. La décision revient au relecteur dans chaque cas.
Société N : histoire, produits et direction
article éditorial · signé par un auteur de la rédaction
Compte comme source indépendantevalidé : 5 sur 5
Pourquoi la Société N change le marché
chronique contributor · l’auteur ne fait pas partie de la rédaction
Ne compte pas Le Tier 1 n’y change rien : ce n’est pas un contenu éditorial du média.validé : 4 sur 5
La Société N annonce le lancement d’un nouveau produit
« actualité » · le texte coïncide avec le communiqué de l’entreprise
Ne compte pas Un communiqué de presse reformulé n’est pas une couverture indépendante.validé : 3 sur 5
04Si les sources manquent
Si la liste ne montre pas deux ou trois articles indépendants et substantiels dans des médias fiables, mieux vaut ne pas commander de page Wikipedia. Que faire à la place.
Une conclusion écrite : les sources indépendantes suffisent-elles pour une page Wikipedia et que manque-t-il. Le coût est déduit du projet.
dès €490Le programme médias prépare les sources : des publications dans des médias indépendants, utilisables ensuite pour la notoriété.
programme médiasTant que les sources manquent : une page sur Wikitia et une entrée dans Wikidata comme étapes intermédiaires.
Wikitia · Wikidata05Questions fréquentes
Cela dépend de la rubrique. Les articles des auteurs de la rédaction de Forbes comptent. Les chroniques contributor, non : ce n’est pas du contenu éditorial du média lui-même. Dans la liste, elles figurent sur une ligne distincte dans le tier « À éviter ».
Non. Un communiqué de presse publié dans un média ou diffusé via PR Newswire, BusinessWire, GlobeNewswire ou Cision n’est pas une source indépendante : il n’y a pas de vérification éditoriale, même si le média est en Tier 1.
Pas comme preuve de notoriété : c’est l’entreprise elle-même qui parle, la source n’est donc pas indépendante. Elle peut servir pour certains faits, mais ne remplace pas une couverture indépendante.
WP:RSP est la liste des sources perpétuelles de Wikipedia : des médias et catégories de sources dont la communauté a débattu la fiabilité à de nombreuses reprises. Le statut est la conclusion de la communauté : généralement fiable, pas de consensus, généralement non fiable, deprecated ou sur liste noire. Le tier est l’évaluation de travail de notre rédaction : dans quelle mesure le média aide la notoriété. Les deux peuvent diverger, c’est pourquoi la carte du média affiche les deux ainsi que l’année de la dernière discussion.
Généralement plusieurs, 2–3, articles indépendants et substantiels dans des médias fiables. Il n’y a pas de seuil exact, et la réponse précise pour votre cas vient d’un audit de notoriété dès €490 : son coût est déduit du projet.
Écrivez-nous : nous évaluerons le média selon le consensus de Wikipedia. Nous mettons la liste à jour, dernière révision en novembre 2026. Les médias du tier « Pas de consensus » sont évalués article par article.
Non. C’est la classification de travail de la rédaction WikiBusines, fondée sur le consensus de la communauté Wikipedia sur les sources fiables. Elle ne garantit aucun résultat : c’est un relecteur de Wikipedia qui tranche pour chaque article.
Audit de notoriété dès €490 : une conclusion écrite sur celles de vos publications qui comptent comme sources indépendantes et si elles suffisent pour une page Wikipedia. Le coût est déduit du projet.
ou écrivez-nous: team@wikibusines.com · Telegram